New Research Shows People’s Usage of Smartphones in Bed in Morning and at Night

There was a time when we used to wash our face or brush our teeth first thing in the morning. But now, the first thing we do after waking up is to check our phone. NordVPN commissioned a survey to find out how much we use our mobile phones in bed. According to the survey, it was found that 83% of the people in the world use their mobile phones in bed for different purposes like watching Netflix or catching up with news. Out of all the countries which participated in the survey, it was found out that Mexicans were the people who use their digital devices in bed the most with 97% claiming to do so. On the other hand, Swiss people use their digital devices in bed the least (75%).

88% of the respondents in the survey use their mobile phones in bed, 43% watch TV, 34% use their laptops while 29% use tablets in bed every night. There is also a difference in mobile usage among morning birds and night owls. 89% of people who stay up most of the night use their mobile phones in bed in the evening or at night while only 38% of the early risers engage in digital activities upon waking up. 90% of the people in Nordic countries use their mobile phones at night while 40% do so in the morning. 46% of the people in the US use their mobile phones in bed in the morning while 89% do so at night.

Mobile alarms are the main reason over half of the respondents of the survey wake up in the morning. After waking up in the morning, 72% of Mexicans check their media, 54% Germans check news and 73% Polish people check emails, messages and SMS while in bed. 51% of the people in the US check the weather forecast on their devices first thing in the morning, 57% check the emails and 51% watch videos. Only 27% of Americans are interested in reading and listening to news after waking up.

The research also says that out of 89% of respondents between the ages of 18-74 who use their mobile phones in bed, only 46% of them are satisfied with their screen times. 42%-45% of people in English speaking and Nordic countries admit that they spend more time on their digital devices than they want to. Residents of Spain, Mexico and Japan say that they use their mobile phones less than the intended times (25%-28%).

More than half of the respondents of the survey admitted to not using bedtime mode on their smartphones while 30%-40% of people living in Australia and Mexico use bedtime mode frequently. 63%-68% of Japanese, American and Polish do not use bedtime mode because they want to be available even when they are sleeping.

There is also a factor of doom scrolling while in bed. 39% of the respondents agreed that they doom scroll in bed while 31% weren’t sure if their scrolling could be categorized as doom scrolling. 44%-50% of Americans, Mexicans and Norwegians admitted to doom scrolling. 40% of the respondents also admitted that they doom scroll on their devices when they are next to their loved ones. 47%-52% of Brits, Australians and Mexicans didn’t find it odd to use their smartphones next to their loved ones in bed.

51% of the respondents admitted that using smartphones in their beds is a waste of their time while about 48% of them admitted that doom scrolling affects their sleep negatively. In the US, the percentage of people admitting the negative effects of using smartphones in bed was 58% while 54% use them next to their significant others.

Read next: HP, Apple, And Dell Dominate U.S. Laptop Market; Notable Shares Held By Acer, Lenovo, Samsung, Microsoft
by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World

Numerous Global Networks Prevented From Manipulating And Abusing ChatGPT, OpenAI Confirms

Tech giant OpenAI is shedding light on how it was able to counteract several different covert operations designed to abuse and influence its ChatGPT models.

The company mentioned how several attempts arose between the 2023 and 2024 period and most of those were said to have been Russian, Iranian, Chinese, or Israeli in origin.

Their objective was designed to enhance engagement from global audiences due to the manipulative behavior being embedded in the popular AI tool, it confirmed.

From the start of this month, the campaigns didn’t seem to have increased any form of audience engagement or attained reach for these services. But OpenAI added how it was working closely with several members of the industry like those from the tech world, government, or civil services to prevent such behavior from arising

The news comes during a time when many experts are casting doubts over the capabilities of Generative AI and how it can end up doing more harm than good. And with the elections period above us all, this means doubtful results taking center stage.

The findings were made public by OpenAi including how several actors made intricate attempts to impact the workings of its popular chat assistants to attain their own gains. It’s not only text that was modified but even images and it arose in higher volumes than what was seen before.

Meanwhile, fake engagement was running high due to attempts to use AI to produce inaccurate and false comments throughout posts generated across social media.

In the past year or so, there’s been plenty of doubt cast on this front including what could possibly take place if such influential campaigns did begin.

During a recent press briefing, OpenAI experts claimed that such reports are eye-openers and lead to many questions getting generated including how loopholes must be filled to better comprehend what’s taking place.

An operation from Russa dubbed Doppelganger made use of the firm’s models to produce headlines for several stories and convert media pieces to posts on popular social media sites. This resulted in more engagement and room for comments in different languages to defer support for controversial topics like Ukraine and Russia’s war against it.

Another shocking report spoke about campaigns to debug codes for popular texting app Telegram which rolled out short comments from the world of politics in various languages.

As per the role of Chinese actors, they managed to produce influential posts for Meta’s Facebook and Instagram and used models to search for more similar activities and roll out texts in various languages on social media.

Similar behavior was noted by the makers of ChatGPT in Iran where the International Union of Virtual Media made use of AI to roll out content that appealed to various global communities.

The disclosure by OpenAi is very much like the ones made by various other tech giants that get published routinely.

For example, we saw Meta roll out a new report regarding coordinated behavior where Iran’s marketing companies made use of false accounts across Facebook to carry out influential campaigns across the app and target those in various regions including Asia, EU, Canada, and the US.

While Meta confirmed that it had worked hard to disband the situation, it wouldn’t be wrong to add how such activities keep arising despite the firm’s continuous efforts to put an end to them, once and for all.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: HP, Apple, And Dell Dominate U.S. Laptop Market; Notable Shares Held By Acer, Lenovo, Samsung, Microsoft
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

HP, Apple, And Dell Dominate U.S. Laptop Market; Notable Shares Held By Acer, Lenovo, Samsung, Microsoft

In 2024, the landscape of laptop brands preferred by Americans shows some interesting trends. HP leads as the most popular choice, found in 32% of households surveyed. Apple follows suit, with MacBooks being used in 28% of households. Dell holds the third spot, preferred by 24% of the surveyed households, completing the top three most popular brands.

Other significant players in the market include Acer, Lenovo, Samsung, and Microsoft. Each of these brands has a notable share, with ownership ranging from 10-14% in American households. The presence of these brands indicates a diverse competition in the sector.

Further down the list, ASUS, Toshiba, Alienware, DigitalStorm, Falcon, Huawei and Vaio also have their shares. These brands show percentages ranging from 1 to 9% reflecting a niche, but dedicated user base. Each brand brings something unique to the table, attracting different segments of consumers.

In terms of market growth, the research firm Technavio predicts a steady rise in the global laptop market. From 2024 to 2028, they expect an average growth rate of 3.2%. A significant part of this growth, around 42% is projected to come from North America. This suggests a strong and expanding market for laptop manufacturers in the region.

An interesting trend noted in the survey is the rising popularity of gaming laptops. These machines are not only sought after by gamers but are increasingly used for tasks requiring high processing power like AI and machine learning. The enhanced graphics processing units in these laptops make them suitable for demanding software applications. Recognizing this dual demand, some companies have begun releasing laptops specifically tailored to meet the needs of both gamers and professionals involved in high-performance computing.

A detailed snapshot of the U.S. laptop market in 2024 shows a vibrant and competitive landscape, with traditional computing needs merging with newer, more demanding applications. This blend of uses underlines the dynamic nature of the laptop market and the diverse preferences of American consumers.

The data is based on a survey conducted by Statista between April 2023 and March 2024, involving 6,843 American adults aged 18–64, who were asked about the laptop brands in their households.

Read next: Generative AI Ignorance: 20-30% of the Public Clueless About These Technologies!
by Mahrukh Shahid via Digital Information World

Generative AI Ignorance: 20-30% of the Public Clueless About These Technologies!

A recent study from the Reuters Institute and the University of Oxford highlights a surprising gap in the public’s knowledge of generative AI. Despite the rapid growth and integration of these tools in technology sectors, 20-30% people in several countries are still unaware of their existence. This survey involved around 12,000 participants from six diverse nations including Argentina, Denmark, France, Japan, the UK and the USA.

The study’s findings are quite revealing, especially considering the penetration of such technologies. For instance, ChatGPT by OpenAI is the most recognized among the surveyed AI tools. About half of the survey’s respondents have heard of ChatGPT. However, daily usage rates are quite low with only 1% in Japan, 2% in France and UK, and 7% in USA.

Other popular AI tools noted in the survey include Gemini by Google and Copilot by Microsoft. It appears that younger people are more inclined to use these AI tools. The data shows that 56% of individuals aged between 18 and 24 have tried using ChatGPT at least once. In contrast, only 16% of those aged 55 and older have done the same.

People mainly use these AI tools for creating various types of media like audio, code, images, and video. About 28% of users apply AI for these purposes, while 24% use it to gather information.

• Also read: What Are The Most Important Issues Facing The US Right Now? This New Survey Says It All

The impact of generative AI is expected to be significant across various sectors. A large majority of respondents, 72%, believe AI will greatly affect search and social media companies. Similarly, 66% feel that news media and the science sector will also see considerable changes due to AI advancements.

Despite the potential benefits, the general sentiment about the future of AI is not entirely optimistic. Many express concerns about issues like the cost of living, equality, and job security in relation to the spread of AI technologies. This mix of awareness, usage, and concern paints a complex picture of the global perspective on generative AI and its future role in society.

Read next: The Rising Trend of Dream scrolling Among Americans
by Mahrukh Shahid via Digital Information World

The Rising Trend of Dream scrolling Among Americans

Americans are increasingly spending their time engaged in an activity known as “dream scrolling.” This involves browsing through items or experiences they aspire to own one day. According to research by Empower, the average American spends about two and a half hours each day on this activity. This adds up to roughly 873 hours or about 36 days annually.

Dream scrolling is particularly popular among different age groups, with Gen Zers leading at over three hours daily. Boomers, on the other hand, spend about an hour each day. Interestingly, half of the people surveyed engage in dream scrolling even while at work, with one in five admitting to spending three to four hours doing this during their work hours.

Many find that looking at potential purchases motivates them to manage their finances better. About 56% of Americans believe that dream scrolling helps them make smarter financial decisions and avoid unplanned spending. Around 30% think it keeps them from going into debt, and 25% say it aids in planning their financial goals. Furthermore, a significant number of people view dream scrolling as an investment in their future aspirations.

When it comes to financial goals, 42% of the respondents spend time envisioning their ideal retirement. This includes their age of retirement, where they will live and their expected monthly expenses. The trend of dream scrolling also reflects on the current economic landscape. About 34% of people feel they have bought fewer items from their dream list than they should have. Millennials feel the most pressure in this regard.

The study also highlighted that economic factors like rising prices, the inability to save money, and increasing debt are major hurdles. Despite these challenges, dreamscrolling remains a hopeful activity for many. Half of the respondents noted that they are spending more time dreamscrolling than in previous years and plan to buy something from their dream list before the end of the year.

People dreamscroll for various reasons. Some browse for homes or vacations, while others look at beauty products, items for their pets, or technology. Despite the challenges, 65% are optimistic about eventually purchasing everything on their dream list. However, nearly a quarter believe they might never be able to afford most of their dream items. More than half of the respondents think that owning their dream items would enhance their financial security, and nearly half see the value in working with a financial professional to achieve their goals.

Read next: The Happiness Chasm: What's Driving Mauritius, U.S, Canada, Uzbekistan, and China's Youth Apart from Their Elders?
by Mahrukh Shahid via Digital Information World

New Analysis: Google AI Overviews Impacting 16% of Ecommerce Queries

Founder of Onely, Bartosz Góralewicz, did an analysis of 25,000 ecommerce queries to find out how much impact Google AI overviews have caused on search results. The results of the analysis revealed that 16% of the commerce queries on Google have AI overview results with 13% search volume. However, 80% of the sources that Google AI lists aren’t available organically and do not appear in organic rankings. If you rank in the top three on Google, there is just an 8% chance that you will appear in the AI overview.

• Also read: AI Overviews And Its Impact On Organic Search Traffic: Should We Be Worried?

Aleyda Solis, who is an international SEO consultant, says that there is a huge difference in Google’s traditional rankings and the rankings which appear in AI overview. Google is also trying to make results “accelerated”, instead of summarizing top ranked websites in product related queries. Replying to Bartosz Góralewicz analysis, Solis stated that Google isn’t mentioning 80% of the pages that aren’t organically ranked in its AI overview, rather it is making an “accelerated” approach which is making going through search results easier for users. Solis also talked about the impact AI overviews have caused on traffic.

This: “80% of AI overview sources don't rank organically for the query” from 25K e-commerce queries that @bart_goralewicz analyzed.

This is what I’ve seen happening too because most of the AI overviews for product related queries are “accelerators”: rather than providing high… https://t.co/UFT2wTG2ht pic.twitter.com/i5neMpALl6

— Aleyda Solis 🕊️ (@aleyda) May 22, 2024

Bartosz Góralewicz says that Google is still rolling out its AI overviews and in future, it can become more advanced for high-cost queries. Google will also try to enable ads in addition to more search visibility to ecommerce websites. Retailers and people with ecommerce websites have to adapt new SEO strategies if they want to keep up with this new search environment. As Google is going for accelerated product displays, ecommerce websites will have to bid farewell to traditional ranking strategies.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: How to turn off AI overviews in Google
by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World

Global Websites at Risk Due to Exposed Sensitive Data

A research team from Cybernews has discovered serious issues affecting 58,364 websites globally. These websites have mistakenly left their configuration files, known as .env files, open to the public. These files contain critical data like passwords and API keys necessary for accessing important services like databases, mail servers, and payment systems.

Unfortunately, this oversight has left these sites and their visitors vulnerable to attacks, data breaches and even complete takeovers. The investigation began on April 9th, and used publicly available indexes to review the .env files. The analysis uncovered 1,141,004 secrets that were not protected. Among the exposed information, database credentials were most common, found on over 27,000 websites. This could potentially allow unauthorized access to sensitive user data such as names, addresses, and passwords. Other frequently leaked secrets include application keys and email credentials, which could be exploited for data theft and phishing attacks.

Further findings showed that sensitive information from marketing automation tools and cloud storage services like AWS were also compromised. This kind of exposure could lead to unauthorized access to a wide range of private company and customer data. The study also revealed that high-risk credentials, which could allow attackers to take over entire websites or conduct extensive attacks, were found in 10% of the leaked secrets.

The United States hosted the highest number of affected websites, followed by Germany, India, and France. However, the issue is truly global, with significant numbers of vulnerable sites across various countries.

The researchers pointed out that .env files are often inadvertently exposed due to their hidden status in some operating systems, which can lead to them being uploaded accidentally. Other common reasons for these exposures include mistakes in version control, misconfigured web servers, and simple human error.

To prevent such risks, it’s crucial for web developers to use secure storage solutions for sensitive data and enforce strict access controls. This can help protect not just the websites but also the millions of users who may unknowingly be at risk due to these security oversights.

Read next:
• Reducing Social Media Use Boosts Mental Health in Youth
• Android On A Mission To Make Sensitive Fingerprint Scanners Available For All Mid-Range Devices
by Mahrukh Shahid via Digital Information World

Reducing Social Media Use Boosts Mental Health in Youth

A study highlighted in the Psychology of Popular Media journal suggests that young adults can improve their mental health by limiting their social media use. Researchers focused on individuals experiencing emotional distress and found that cutting down screen time to one hour a day over three weeks decreased depression , anxiety, and the fear of missing out.

During adolescence and young adulthood, individuals go through major social, physical, and emotional changes. This makes them particularly susceptible to mental health issues. Statistics include that about 20% of young people are diagnosed with a mental disorder annually, with depression and anxiety being most common. This vulnerability was notably evident during the COVID-19 pandemic, which saw significant increases in depression and anxiety among Canadian youth.

With over 81% of Canadian youth spending at least two hours daily on social media, concerns have grown about its impact on their psychological well being. Previous studies have pointed to a link between extensive social media use and deteriorated mental health symptoms. However these studies often relied on self-reported data and did not explore causality.

To address these limitations, researchers at Carleton university conducted an experiment with 220 undergraduate students who were regular social media users. The study began with a week of usual social media activity followed by three weeks where participants were divided into two groups. The intervention group was asked to limit their social media use to no more than one hour ago per day. Compliance was monitored through daily screenshots of their social media usage.

The findings were significant. Participants who reduced their social media use reported fewer symptoms of depression and anxiety. They also experienced less fear of missing out and increased their nightly sleep by about 30 minutes. The experiment showed that even a slight reduction in social media time could lead to notable improvements in mental health.

The study only lasted three weeks, and it's unclear if these benefits would continue over a longer period. Furthermore, the results depended on self-reported data, which might not always accurately reflect actual usage. Despite these limitations, the research offers promising insights into how reducing social media use can positively affect mental health. Future studies might explore what activities replace reduced screen time and whether these activities contribute further to improving mental health.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: New Google Research Claims An Alarming Rise In Image Disinformation Is Taking Place And AI Is To Blame
by Mahrukh Shahid via Digital Information World

Instagram Adds New Perk For Paid Subscribers That Allows Them to Restrict DM Requests To Other Meta Verified Users Only

It's a feature that has been in the testing phase for a while now but we can finally confirm how Instagram is rolling out another great benefit for Meta verified users.

The app will now enable paid subscribers the chance to restrict requests for DMs to other paying members only. This was shared recently through a new screenshot that was published by Radu Oncescu.

He revealed how all verified profiles on the popular social media app can now make the most of this option of restricted message requests online to those being verified.

In case you’re still wondering, the term verified users refers to those on the platform having notable accounts such as those belonging to IG team members or those who have paid subscriptions after signing up to the company’s verified initiative.

This way, such settings provide users with the chance to filter unneeded content or junk and make sure only those of a serious nature are entertained across the user’s DM.

When we mention the term serious, we mean accounts of high-profile individuals and those capable of paying the fee for getting verified. It does not mean scammers cannot reach you as many can afford that fee. But it does mean that there would surely be a dramatic fall in the large number of bot profiles that add users like you to random conversations. Other examples include the decreased likelihood of poor marriage proposals taking center stage inside inboxes that might seem annoying to tackle on a usual basis.

It honestly does also depend on how many such requests you get across your DMs and if you have the spare time to sort through those online. In case you happen to be off the lot and not getting too many such requests in general, it might be a waste and not worth your time or effort to have it filtered. But in terms of personal utility, the value does increase.

We feel this could be valuable to a small number of users on the app but if you happen to be one of those keenly looking forward to benefiting from it, then congratulations as this update will soon be launching.

We also find it interesting how it’s a rollout that’s awfully similar to what tech entrepreneur Elon Musk included for paid users on the X platform in 2023. This enabled those who were verified to have DMs restricted to only those who were paying.

The only difference now is that it got rid of verification tags from all those accounts featuring non-paying members. So that means the only DMs you attain arise from those who have been given the chance to make a payment. But again, seeing it reactivate the premium accounts without additional costs was major news for those having more than 2500 followers.

As a whole, it’s quite similar, we have to agree. Now the question is whether or not it adds value in real life for users or not and from what we feel, it’s a little questionable on that front right now.

Read next: OpenAI Rolls Out New Efforts To Ensure Its Generative AI Systems Are Safer For Use
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

OpenAI Rolls Out New Efforts To Ensure Its Generative AI Systems Are Safer For Use

The makers of ChatGPT want the world to know that user safety and security are two primary goals at the moment when it comes to AI systems.

The company was seen speaking more on this front and also shed light on how training for its next AI model has also begun, putting a lot of speculations to rest.

During the early hours of the morning, it was mentioned how its board of directors rolled out a new Safety and Security Committee which would examine how the firm’s safety procedures come into play in terms of product development.

The news was published through a blog post that stated more details on this front and how the tech giant’s CEO would be included in that certain committee. Other members would be those from the company’s board as well as employees it deems to be a powerful part of the firm like the chief scientist and its leading member for security affairs. Meanwhile, a host of other leading experts would also be contacted from outside the firm which would attain the role of consultants for the tech giant.

The blog post stated how the initial task right now had to do with evaluating the processes running in the company and what safeguards were in place for three months. When that period is up, the committee will share more recommendations with all members of the board. After getting a comprehensive review on this front, the AI giant would go public with all of the findings and which recommendations were adopted that are consistent with user security.

The news about this new committee coming into play has been in light of the shocking discovery that the firm had to disband its superalignment team at the start of this month.

This was designed to better provide means to ensure humans remain at the forefront and AI is unable to supercede them as the fear of humans getting extinct due to AI being smarter is very real.

• Also read: Top Midjourney Alternatives You Can Try in 2024

As one can expect, the news left a lot of questions in people’s minds including what steps the company was doing to prevent this from happening.

Now, we’re seeing how those fears are finally being put to rest with this new committee coming into play.

But on the other hand, news regarding the training of a new frontier model is also not being taken lightly. The company vowed that this new project would bring to light a host of capabilities linked to their AGI goals. This would all be done ensuring security remains the top priority at all times.

At the start of this month, the tech giant revealed a new launch of its latest GPT-4 model called GPT-4o. It’s certainly more realistic in its approach, featuring real-life voices and interactions to make users feel more comfortable that they’re talking to something very similar to another human and not a machine. And the best bit is that it’s free for all.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: How Does Google Rank Content? New Trove Of Leaked Documents Unveil The Company’s Search Algorithm Workings
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

How Does Google Rank Content? New Trove Of Leaked Documents Unveil The Company’s Search Algorithm Workings

If you’ve ever been keen on knowing how Google Search works, this just might be your lucky day.

A new trove of bombshell documents (hat tip to Mike King and Rand Fishkin) was leaked online that gives an unexpected look into the search engine giant’s algorithm, answering a plethora of questions that have been under wraps for years.

Documents in bundles were unraveled that arose from the company’s internal API warehouse. Thanks to a new bot that works on an automated basis, the documents were provided to the co-founder of Spark Toro who has now made the shocking findings public so most of us can benefit.

A thorough review and analysis was given on this front and thanks to the leaks, we’re bringing forward the data to you in terms of what to expect next for this algorithm.

The details are certainly invaluable concerning those working with SEOs who can really interpret what this means in better language. The news is certainly huge and a leak that most of us could never encompass because let’s face it, we’re talking about Google here.

From what we know so far, we can confirm how the current documents delineate how the data is accurate till the date of March of this year so it’s fairly recent. Secondly, a massive 2596 modules had been represented via API documentation and had a staggering 14,000 attributes attached to it.

No details regarding weighting were provided but re-ranking functions were highlighted which can adjust data as per requirements. Meanwhile, content could be demoted for a few reasons including location, links not matching with target pages, product reviews, and user dissatisfaction where SERP (search engine result pages) signals are involved.

Remember, the company carries a copy version for each page getting indexed so that it recalls the changes it makes simultaneously. However, the firm only makes use of 20 changes during a link analysis.

This does not prove how the firm’s reps may have lied in terms of links not getting a top 3 ranking or as a whole, links matter so much less for the sake of ranking. Two factors could be the truth but again, more details regarding weighing are required here.

Another major finding that is not shocking is how clicks really do matter if and when you wish to have your content rank well. If you want the best, keep producing documents that feature all of the above as the tech giant makes use of several measurements including longer Clicks.

Documents that are longer in duration could be truncated but shorter ones do get a score depending on their original factor.

To put it simply as per the experts, the greater the number of clicks can only come when you have a broader array of queries coming into play. You earn a lot of diversity when you wish to rank. It all does make sense as stronger content will ensure that happens always.

Content producers and publishers need to ensure they drive better traffic to get the best user experience in the end so that it sends great signals to Google and your page gets the best ranking.

Yes, Google makes use of clicks via ranking, especially when it comes down to the Navboost System. And if there’s one thing to take home from this all, Brand matters the most.

Markets who wish to better organic search or their traffic need to come up with the best brand outside of Search.

• Also read: Top 9 Alternatives of Midjourney that Are Easy to Use For Beginners

Other interesting points mentioned included a discussion about authorship and how the company stores data belonging to authors to see if the data actually belongs to them. Other than that, models like Chrome data were talked about that delineate how Google utilizes information from the Chrome browser for the sake of better ranking purposes.

The Android maker even whitelists a few domains linked to topics such as the elections or the COVID-19 period. Google also carries the capability to enhance or demote certain pages through a feature dubbed Twiddler.

In the end, a few expert pointers were provided that Google firmly believes in including fresh content where data is marked by date. Next, seeing if a document belongs to a core topic or not is determined. Thirdly, page titles carry weightage while the company is said to store data linked to domain registration.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: The 9 Best Competitor Analysis Tools In 2024 For Digital Marketers and SEOs
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

Top 9 Alternatives of Midjourney that Are Easy to Use For Beginners

Creating art through AI has become a new trend, with Midjourney leading the way with its remarkable capabilities. However, its recent transition to only paid subscription model has left many geeks like us seeking alternatives. But don't worry, there are plenty of other options available in the market. In this post, we unveil a curated selection of the top 9 Midjourney alternatives, emphasizing 'free use' armed with potent text-to-image capabilities. Whether you're a seasoned artist or an aspiring enthusiast, these AI image generators offer a liberating canvas to explore your creativity without emptying your pockets.

1- Leonardo.ai

LeonardoAI offers a unique opportunity to train your own AI model (yes based on your input data), allowing you to generate hundreds of variations from your training data. Many users prefer it as a free alternative to Midjourney for this reason. Particularly advantageous for game developers, this tool enables the creation of models for various items from existing work, with customizable themes like futuristic, medieval, or fantasy. To access the LeonardoAI, you must join their early bird access waitlist and await an email invitation. Reviews highlight its value, with one user noting its affordability compared to Midjourney. However, it should be noted that LeonardoAI requires a waitlist and early bird access only. Pricing options range from a free tier offering 150 credits per day to paid plans starting at $10 per month.

2- PlayGround AI

Playground AI is the top best alternative of Midjourney that lets the users generate the first 500 images for free. Playground AI works the fastest and can generate more than one image at a time. However, the free version entails limitations, such as a waiting period after generating the initial 500 images and a decline in image quality after 50 images. Pricing options range from a free tier offering 500 images per month to paid plans starting at $12 per month, catering to varying user needs.

3- Bing AI Image Creator

Microsoft Bing also has its AI image creator but not many people know about it. It is now powered by Dall-E and can also be used as an image generator. But users cannot edit or customize its generated images like other tools.

4- Stable Diffusion

It is a text to image generation software that many websites on the internet use to create images for their websites. The flaw of this software is that it cannot produce perfect human images like other software. Users also complain of server problems due to high traffic on its website.

5- Craiyon

Craiyon is similar to the Dall-E model and generates images easily. It is best for users who are beginners in AI image generation. Users do not need to sign up for using this tool. It is a good software but images take some time to generate. The big drawback of this tool is it produce too pixelated images, means you can't get a big enough image out of it.

6- Adobe Firefly

Adobe is combining Photoshop to generate AI images for its users. There are many features available in Adobe Firefly like text to brush, text to vector, text to template, etc., in addition to text to image. The only con of this software is that image generation takes some time.

7- Lexica

Lexica, powered by the Stable Diffusion AI image generation model, offers impressive results. With a user-friendly interface and quick image generation, it's highly accessible, especially for beginners. One notable aspect is its ability to generate similar results based on any input, aiding inspiration. However, commercial use requires a subscription, with plans ranging from free to $48 per month.

8- Google Gemini

Google Gemini serves as a compelling alternative to paid AI image creators like Midjourney, especially for users seeking free of cost solutions. As part of Google's AI tools, Gemini offers decent image generation capabilities. Users can leverage its features to create high-quality visuals quickly and efficiently, tailored to their specific needs. However, it is not available in all markets, plus users may still encounter limitations in terms of customization, censorship and advanced features compared to dedicated image creation tools.

9- Meta's 'Imagine' AI image generator

Meta's 'Imagine' image generator is a user-friendly tool that creates AI-powered images in a quick manner. Similar to Midjourney, it offers a seamless experience for both beginners and experts. Imagine's unique feature lets images change in real-time based on your input, making it a promising alternative for creative projects. As Meta refines Imagine, it stands as a compelling option for those seeking an AI image generator with dynamic capabilities.

Conclusion

With so many options available, you have a world of AI creativity at your fingertips. Whether you're a beginner or a seasoned artist, these tools offer endless possibilities to bring your ideas to life without breaking the bank.

Read next: AI Tool Usage Declines Among Creators in 2024, Survey Finds
by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World

AI Overviews And Its Impact On Organic Search Traffic: Should We Be Worried?

• 42% of queries in the health vertical showed AI Overviews (AIOs).
• There was a very strong correlation (0.917) between sites appearing in the top 10 organic results and those cited in AIOs. In simpler terms, websites that perform well in organic search are more likely to be featured in AI Overviews.
• A strong negative correlation (-0.61) was found between cited URLs in AIOs and changes in organic traffic. Meaning that as the frequency of citations in AIOs increases, there is a corresponding decrease in organic traffic to those cited URLs.
• When AIOs appeared but a site wasn't cited, there was an average loss of -2.8% organic traffic.

It’s been close to 14 days since we saw search engine giant Google launch AI Overviews (AIOs). The rollout was not all positive and faced backlash from publishers and users who feared the worst was yet to come.

Now, experts are sitting down to determine what impact it can have, if any, on organic traffic and if the fear of implications wreaking havoc is really true or not.

Remember, it always helps to see what outcome can result from a new endeavor, especially in those cases where misinformation reports are on the high, not to mention harmful recommendations peaking as we speak.

Can they affect organic traffic to the extent that quick replies to users’ prompts end up doing more harm than good? We feel there might be a small possibility that AIOs roll out greater traffic to certain cited sites.

This particular study conducted by Kevin Indig based on ZipTie data crawled search results on 1675 questions of the health domain to see when and how the search engine giant displays AI Overviews. This was combined with data from Search Console to determine the implications it had and the influence backlinks bring forward in terms of domain traffic.

The greater rates are justifiable because Google mentioned how displaying overviews for complex questions is more likely to take place in the health domain than in e-commerce.

There was a weak relationship with words count that indicated longer questions triggering more overviews. Still, to see the figures is just overwhelming considering how this is health where getting wrong data can be deemed to be a serious risk.

There was no relationship reported for the difficulty of keywords or even search volume. But we do feel this domain tends to be cited more frequently when questions are simpler.

It was similarly noted how overviews pop up on those People Also Ask pages, featured snippets, or even discussions and forums modules. It all makes a lot of sense as these point to informational searches. There were no correlations found between top ads and knowledge panels but they were less frequent than usual Search Engine Results Page features.

The question is who pops up in these AI Overviews? In this study, 704 AI-based answer cited 4,493 websites which is close to 6.3 links per overview.

There’s a strong correlation between websites that pop up in the top 10 organic results and websites cited across overviews. Another interesting point worth mentioning is how no strong links between domains getting many overview citations and their respective organic traffic were seen. The same was the case with backlinks and ranking keywords.

Any page that ranks well for keywords is more than likely to get cited across AIOs but it’s not clear when the search engine giant would cite a webpage that does not rank well for a particular keyword.

Now the main part is worth discussing. Can these AI Overviews affect organic traffic or not?

For this comparison, organic clicks arising from the Search Console for a certain domain across 1675 non-branded keywords were used in week 7 and compared to that in week 14. When you exclude those terms having low traffic, 560 overviews showed up for various keywords.

The conclusion is that a very strong negative correlation was discovered between URLs cited and those linked to traffic change. This indicated how overview citations send out fewer clicks to URLs cited.

However, the results do tend to vary by the intent of the user. Most of these URLs lose out on clicks, thanks to these overviews. Similarly, it’s quite comparable to the likes of Featured Snippets that sent fewer or more clicks depending on which keyword is being used.

To conclude, strong SEO performance appears to be the best means by which you can pop up across AI Overviews. Even if Google cites URLs that are not doing great, it does not matter. But with that being said, we are still in the dark in terms of which content features make it likely that it would get cited for the AI-powered overviews.

As a whole, AI Overviews have a stronger impact than the usual Google Search. It’s the first AI rollout that greatly alters the cash cow for the company.

Read next: AI Tool Usage Declines Among Creators in 2024, Survey Finds
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

ChatGPT’s Fate In The EU: Data Protection Taskforce Reports Preliminary Conclusions On Privacy Compliance

It’s been close to a year since we saw the EU allocate a task force designed to oversee the workings of OpenAI’s popular ChatGPT tool.

The goal was to see how the EU’s rulebook applies to the viral chatbot and from what has been published so far regarding preliminary findings, we can confirm that things are mostly ok in that regard but there are still a host of legal issues which continue to remain undecided.

This includes lawfulness as well as fairness arising with OpenAI’s processing.

These issues might seem tiny but they’re pivotal because many are deemed to be confirmed violations of the overall privacy regime. As a result, they can go up to 4% of the worldwide yearly turnover penalty.

Similarly, watchdogs could order for non-compliant processing to come to an end. So to put it simply, the company is really getting tasked in the sense that a regulatory risk does exist where laws are allocated for the AI domain but they’re still far from getting operational.

A certain amount of clarity is necessary from the data protectors of the EU regarding data protection laws that apply to tools like ChatGPT. The bet is safe in terms of giving OpenAI empowerment so that it can carry on with usual operations daily, despite a huge number of issues arising in the tech sector that violate different aspects of the GDPR.

For instance, the investigation linked to Poland’s DPA opened up complaints regarding the chatbot of a certain individual and then refused to fix the errors. Another issue was rolled out in Austria. So a lot of such issues mean saying hello to less enforcement.

The GDPR is a law that is applicable when companies engage in data collection of users where personal information gets processed. It’s a very common behavior from Large Language Models including ChatGPT. They’re scrapping data from the web for training purposes like siphoning certain posts across social media apps.

The regulations also empower DPAs to file laws to stop non-compliant processing of data from taking place. So as one can imagine, it’s a powerful endeavor for sharing how AI giants could function in the region when GDPR enforcers start opting to pull it.

We did get a taste of that from last year when lawmakers in Italy advocated against the tool on this front and banned it from processing the user data of locals. This resulted in a temporary shutdown of the service across the nation.

ChatGPT continued with operations across Italy after changes were done to data and controls given to users as a long list of demands offered by the DPA. But it was still under the shadow of a huge cloud of how it can function across the EU.

To put it simply, if you wish to have a tool that processes the data of users, you need to get the legal basis sorted out for that framework to ensure continuous operation. If not, then sadly there’s no room for you.

This particular report is bringing to light another very integral point. It discusses how the platform requires legal validation for data processing. From pre-processing to training and the final output too - there is a lot to consider to deem ChatGPT as lawful in its behavior.

Coming down to fairness and transparency, the GDPR has made it so clear that these aspects are not an option. They must be complied with by OpenAI and no arguments on this front could be accepted.

As far as transparency is concerned, the task force mentions how OpenAI needs to make use of exemptions that notify people regarding data collection about them.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: Global Startup Rankings: The Top Cities to Watch
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

Global Startup Rankings: The Top Cities to Watch

Pitchbook's rankings spotlight the premier cities worldwide for startups, where vibrant ecosystems and ample funding opportunities fuel entrepreneurial dreams.

Whenever we talk about a startup in a city, it is important that the city should have a decent number of venture capitalists, community of founders, and tech workforce. For the rankings, each city was analyzed from the maturity of their start-up in a six-year time which ended in Q2 of 2023. So, according to these rankings, San Francisco is the top city in the world with $427.6 billion capital which was raised in the last six-years. It has a development score of 89.5.

The second best startup city in the world is New York, Followed by Beijing. Both cities have a development score of 76. New York raised $179.9 billion capital in the six years while Beijing raised $161.2 billion in capital. New York is a home to many popular companies like SkillShare and Hugging Face which are well-known examples for a startup. Beijing, which is a city in China, is home to ByteDance which is a parent company to TikTok. This company is one of the most valuable companies in the world right now. Another city from China, Shanghai, is also in the top five best startup cities in the world. Most of the startups in China are fully funded by the government and are based on hard tech.

Other startup cities in the top ten list of best startup cities in the world include Los Angeles, Boston, London, Shenzhen, Seoul and Tokyo. It is seen that most countries in the top twenty are from China and the USA. Singapore is also set to becoming a tech startup hub for many companies. It is the fourteenth best city for a startup in the world with a development score of 52. A good $45.7 billion capital was raised in Singapore in just six years and it has an impressive venture funding of $1060 per person.

City	Development score	Capital raised (in billion)	Growth score	Deal count	Exit value (in billion)
San Francisco	89.5	$427.6B	28.2	19,898	$766.3B
New York	76	$179.9B	41.5	13,594	$171.7B
Beijing	75.6	$161.2B	15.4	8,835	$279.2B
Shanghai	72.9	$130.3B	26.5	7,422	$186.8B
Los Angeles	71.40	$144.6B	39.9	9,781	$181.4B
Boston	70.40	$117.0B	34.8	6,044	$172.8B
London	64.00	$99.0B	38.8	11,533	$71.9B
Shenzhen	62.70	$46.4B	45.3	5,020	$66.3B
Seoul	61.1	$31.1B	52.1	6,196	$71.0B
Tokyo	60.20	$26.2B	66.6	5,590	$28.0B
Hangzhou	59.10	$50.7B	20.5	3,361	$88.7B
Washington D.C.	54.70	$43.7B	61.7	2,706	$28.2B
Seattle	53.5	$31.7B	26.3	2,693	$35.6B
Singapore	52.20	$45.7B	74.8	4,507	$38.0B
San Diego	52.00	$33.5B	35.5	2,023	$44.7B
Austin	51.80	$26.4B	46.6	2,636	$22.9B
Guangzhou	51.70	$24.7B	50.9	1,700	$24.0B
Tel Aviv	51.00	$21.0B	39.7	1,936	$32.2B
Denver	50.60	$26.8B	51.1	2,489	$29.9B
Berlin	50.40	$31.2B	27.9	2,469	$15.9B
Suzhou	$49.7	$15.1B	49	2,207	$29.2B
Paris	49.50	$32.8B	64.4	3,677	$6.6B
São Paulo	48.6	$17.0B	46	1,685	$43.9B
Chicago	47.2	$28.8B	31.5	2,377	$11.6B
Salt Lake City	46.9	$13.1B	18.2	1,172	$24.3B
Hong Kong	46.6	$19.6B	27.8	982	$30.9B
Stockholm	44.8	$28.7B	26.1	1,775	$27.5B
Toronto	44.3	$15.2B	42.8	2,024	$7.1B
Philadelphia	43.1	$25.8B	53.2	3,014	$12.9B
Miami	42.6	$21.7B	50.3	2,216	$9.4B
Nanjing	42.4	$16.3B	58.7	1,419	$15.6B
Mumbai	42.2	$15.7B	45.1	1,767	$10.9B
Chengdu	41.8	$8.3B	59.7	1,259	$8.1B
Bengaluru	41.1	$32.2B	42.7	1,668	$17.6B
Amsterdam	40.7	$11.3B	68.7	1,176	$10.6B
Dallas	40.4	$10.8B	25.4	1,346	$12.0B
Atlanta	39	$13.1B	35.4	1,550	$6.6B
Vancouver	38.3	$6.7B	10.4	1,010	$10.0B
Changsha	37.9	$8.8B	43.3	443	$10.2B
Munich	37.6	$11.3B	48	986	$3.9B
Wuxi	37.5	$4.6B	71.8	513	$7.9B
Raleigh	36.6	$15.0B	45.6	1,075	$7.3B
Sydney	36.3	$7.8B	35.4	1,141	$5.1B
Hefei	36.1	$9.3B	86.5	735	$11.1B
Phoenix	36	$9.8B	50.1	850	$11.9B
Minneapolis	36	$11.6B	44.8	987	$16.1B
Montreal	35.9	$7.3B	37.6	768	$3.0B
Gurugram	34.9	$13.3B	29	826	$17.0B
Portland, OR	34.6	$6.1B	36.1	903	$10.6B
Houston	34.1	$9.4B	63.8	1,044	$5.1B

Source: The world’s top startup cities / pitchbook - April 18, 2024

Read next: Reputation Matters: How Hardware Giants Outshine Social Media Platforms
by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World

AI Tool Usage Declines Among Creators in 2024, Survey Finds

In recent times, there’s been a noticeable shift in how content creators are using artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Earlier in May, Epidemic Sound shared findings in a report, titled "Future of the Creator Economy". They conducted a survey which involved 1,500 creators who earn money from platforms like YouTube, podcasts and social media. The report revealed a decline in the usage of AI tools among the surveyed creators in 2024, when compared to 2023 data.

Although 84% of creators acknowledged using AI tools for creating content, there was a significant drop in the use of specific AI technologies. For instance, the use of image or video recognition software decreased from 64.9% in 2023 to 46.5% in 2024. Automated transcription tools and chatbots also saw a decline, dropping from 57.4% to 32.8% and 55.6% to 32.2%, respectively.

The decline in usage is linked to several concerns among creators. Nearly half of the surveyed individuals were worried about the quality of AI-generated content. Concerns about originality and plagiarism were also prevalent, with 38.5% and 33% of creators respectively wary of these issues. Furthermore, about 28.7% expressed apprehensions about the ethical implications of AI, such as data privacy and proper crediting.

The changing attitude towards AI among creators was highlighted by several of them. Some have reduced their reliance on AI due to issues with accuracy, bias, and online security. One creator mentioned that using AI for generating content designs turned out to be more time-consuming than creating the ideas independently. Another creator has limited the use of tools like ChatGPT to administrative tasks, moving away from creative applications.

The impact of these concerns is also affecting jobs in creative fields. For example, one head of a production company mentioned that many are now employed to refine work initially done by AI, which has led to fewer job hours available.

Creators have various reasons for stepping back from AI. Some, particularly from underrepresented groups, feel that the lack of diversity in AI development affects the inclusivity and relevance of the tools, with some stating that the tools do not adequately reflect diverse perspectives.

This shift represents a significant turn in how digital tools are perceived and used in the creative industry, as creators balance innovation with authenticity and ethical considerations.

Read next: Can ChatGPT Be Trusted? New Study Says The Tool Offers Inaccurate Programming Replies 52% Of The Time
by Mahrukh Shahid via Digital Information World

Can A Degree In AI Set You Up For Success? This Gen Z Software Engineer Has The Best Advice

Time after time, we keep hearing one thing: AI is the next big tech, and that has many young minds wondering about one thing. Should a degree in AI be attempted? And if yes, what are the future benefits of doing so.

Well, thanks to one software engineer by the name of Sajjaad Khader, we’ve got more news on this front. He’s not only a graduate of Georgia Tech but also an undergraduate in the field of AI. So who better to ask than him, right?

He says that not all that glitters in the world of AI is gold so you might want to rethink that career decision if it involves majoring in the field. But that does not mean he’s discouraging anyone. Instead, he says those with certain capabilities should opt for the degree and others struggling in three certain areas shouldn’t.

This got us curious and we had to decipher which three attributes aren’t great for the degree. So let’s take a look!

The 22-year-old explained how he has always had a passion for software engineering since a very young age. Today, he’s got serious advice for those considering a degree in the field as his experience has taught him quite a few lessons.

• Related: The Top US Colleges and States for Local Entrepreneurs and Business Founders

In the past three years, getting his master’s meant he was ready to venture into the field but along the way, he saw many struggling with interactive intelligence. Today, he’s got a top position in a tech firm that’s based on AI.

Speaking of the competition in this field, so many universities have started to roll out degrees in this regard. A lot was dedicated to the world of AI and it was not uncommon to find diplomas, courses, and even certifications online too.

Yes, he does feel it’s worthwhile and a great degree to set forth during this moment in time. But it’s not for everyone. The field has some not-so-glamorous aspects worth a mention, he adds.

• Also read: Where Did Today's Most Influential Tech Leaders Start Their Careers?

In a short video on TikTok, he shed light on who shouldn’t enter the field and why. And we think it’s a great piece of advice for obvious reasons.

For starters, if your attention span is low, this is not for you. The field tends to get boring, especially when you need months to design simulations before you see the results coming into play. And not everyone finds that interesting or can keep up. It’s a long process and a lot of patience is needed.

Secondly, those struggling with math cannot or should not think about majoring in AI. Khader explains that it’s beyond coding and a lot of courses were math-related. And one of his very first assignments had to do math galore.

From graphs and charts to numbers and letters, he calls it a very complex math discourse and it’s not for everyone, especially if this domain is your weak point. And if those great with problem-solving and analytics struggle at times, he added.

Last but not least, Khader says that those struggling with making commitments cannot be in this field because results take a really long time. You not only have to show commitment to the degree but be willing to get more than one. In the same way, you need to stay committed to the project’s vision in the long term. It would take a lot of time to attain results.

Image: Sajjaad Khader/TikTok

Just think about, waking up every four hours from our sleep to keep a check on anti-spam software that is in the development phase. Yes, it’s not for everyone and if you don’t have that kind of passion for long-term commitments, then this is not for you.

There are days when you don’t know what can happen next but to still be keen and open to learning until the right result is obtained is the goal. And as he puts it, not just physical work but mental too without getting exhausted.

A closing message from the expert himself included how a degree in AI isn’t necessary if you wish to work in the tech world. Yes, it’s one of the most trending fields today but the demand for tech jobs isn’t getting any less.

@sajjaadkhader AI and Machine Learning is NOT what you expect #ai #machinelearning #chatgpt #softwareengineer #fyp ♬ original sound - Sajjaad Khader

Read next: How Much Education Do You Need to Become a CEO?
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

The Happiness Chasm: What's Driving Mauritius, U.S, Canada, Uzbekistan, and China's Youth Apart from Their Elders?

The World Happiness Report ranked countries with the most unhappy youth compared to their older generations. The country with the biggest happiness gap between young and older generations is Mauritius with a difference of 57 points between those two generations. Youth is ranked at 85 in happiness rank while older adults have happiness rank of 28. The biggest reason why the youth is unhappy in Mauritius is the high unemployment rate.

The USA ranks second in the happiness gap between youth and old adults with a gap of 52 points. Older adults are ranked 10 while young people are ranked 62 in the happiness index. Canada, Uzbekistan and China ranked third, fourth and fifth with a happiness gap of 50, 49 and 49 respectively. The youth happiness rank in Japan is 73 while old adults happiness rank is 36. Mongolia has a 33 happiness ranks difference between younger and older generations. The other countries that made it to the top ten list of countries with most unhappy youth are Algeria, Libya and Singapore. These countries have happiness gap ranks of 31, 30 and 28 respectively.

While prevailing notion suggests that young adults below 30 points are typically the happiest, this data shows a deviation from that trend, with older generations being significantly happier than the youth. There is nothing wrong with old adults being happier than young people, but the unhappiness rate in these young people is alarming. There are different factors that are not letting young people be happy like worries about employment, wars, government policies, climatic changes, economic responsibilities and depression and loneliness after covid-19. Many young people in Canada and the USA are also worried that they will never be able to own a house because of current economic conditions. These type of worries do not let the youth be happy.

Country	Youth Happiness Rank	Old Happiness Rank	Gap: Youth/Old
Mauritius	85	28	57
U.S.	62	10	52
Canada	58	8	50
Uzbekistan	71	22	49
China	79	30	49
Japan	73	36	37
Mongolia	86	53	33
Algeria	93	62	31
Libya	80	50	30
Singapore	54	26	28
Kazakhstan	69	42	27
Philippines	70	43	27
Laos	104	77	27
Germany	47	21	26
Spain	55	29	26
Malta	57	31	26
Bahrain	77	51	26
Kyrgyzstan	81	55	26
Mauritania	119	93	26
Chad	120	94	26
UAE	35	11	24
France	48	25	23
Brazil	60	37	23
Guinea	103	81	22
New Zealand	27	6	21
Myanmar	122	102	20
Venezuela	83	64	19
Norway	20	3	17
Jamaica	84	68	16
Nepal	92	76	16
Saudi Arabia	42	27	15
Niger	116	101	15
Madagascar	124	109	15
Sweden	18	4	14
Hong Kong	97	84	13
UK	32	20	12
Burkina Faso	117	105	12
Australia	19	9	10
Estonia	44	35	9
Bolivia	74	65	9
Türkiye	101	92	9
Liberia	113	104	9
Mali	125	116	9
Bangladesh	128	120	8
Sierra Leone	141	133	8
Uruguay	30	24	6
India	127	121	6
Egypt	130	124	6
Yemen	135	129	6
Finland	7	2	5
Belgium	24	19	5
Ireland	21	16	5
South Africa	87	82	5
Malawi	137	132	5
Denmark	5	1	4
Thailand	45	41	4
Colombia	76	72	4
Ivory Coast	100	96	4
Kuwait	16	13	3
Poland	43	40	3
Italy	41	38	3
Congo	88	85	3
Palestine	102	99	3
Tanzania	129	126	3
Netherlands	9	7	2
Russia	68	66	2
Tajikistan	89	87	2
Cambodia	112	110	2
Zimbabwe	139	137	2
DRC	140	139	1
Lebanon	142	141	1
Guatemala	49	49	0
Tunisia	118	118	0
Jordan	123	123	0
Ethiopia	131	131	0
Lesotho	138	138	0
Afghanistan	143	143	0
Iceland	4	5	-1
Switzerland	13	14	-1
Cameroon	106	107	-1
Togo	126	127	-1
Honduras	56	58	-2
Gambia	110	112	-2
Benin	115	117	-2
Eswatini	134	136	-2
Austria	12	15	-3
Comoros	132	135	-3
Vietnam	65	69	-4
Greece	53	57	-4
Indonesia	75	79	-4
Mozambique	94	98	-4
Ghana	121	125	-4
Iraq	90	95	-5
Sri Lanka	123	128	-5
Luxembourg	6	12	-6
Costa Rica	11	17	-6
Cyprus	51	57	-6
Zambia	136	142	-6
Chile	39	46	-7
South Korea	52	59	-7
Malaysia	64	71	-7
Iran	96	103	-7
Botswana	133	140	-7
Taiwan Province of China	25	34	-9
Namibia	105	114	-9
Peru	63	73	-10
Kenya	109	119	-10
Mexico	22	33	-11
Argentina	34	45	-11
Senegal	99	111	-12
Czechia	10	23	-13
Georgia	78	91	-13
Azerbaijan	95	108	-13
Dominican Republic	61	75	-14
Gabon	91	106	-15
Morocco	98	113	-15
Pakistan	107	122	-15
Israel	2	18	-16
Kosovo	23	39	-16
Armenia	72	88	-16
Slovenia	15	32	-17
Portugal	46	63	-17
Nicaragua	28	47	-19
Latvia	31	51	-20
Slovakia	38	60	-22
Nigeria	108	130	-22
Uganda	111	134	-23
Ecuador	59	84	-25
Panama	26	56	-30
North Macedonia	67	98	-31
Ukraine	82	115	-33
Hungary	36	70	-34
Albania	66	100	-34
El Salvador	17	52	-35
Bosnia & Herzegovina	33	68	-35
Romania	8	48	-40
Lithuania	1	44	-43
Paraguay	37	83	-46
Montenegro	50	97	-47
Bulgaria	40	90	-50
Serbia	3	54	-51
Moldova	29	86	-57
Croatia	14	80	-66

Read next: From Abstract to Urban: A Guide to Understanding Artistic Styles

by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World