Monday, June 16, 2025

Meta Expands WhatsApp Monetization with In-App Ads and Paid Channel Subscriptions

WhatsApp is preparing to introduce advertisements in parts of its app that are not tied to private conversations. The changes are expected to appear first in the Status and Updates tabs, both of which are designed for broader, public content rather than one-to-one chats. Ads will be shown in between Status posts, which work similarly to Stories on Instagram, and in the Updates tab, where users can browse and follow Channels.

The platform, owned by Meta, says these ads will not affect the main inbox or compromise the privacy of encrypted messages. Instead, ad targeting will rely on general data such as a user’s country, city, app language, and their activity with ads or Channels they’ve followed. Users who have linked their WhatsApp account with Facebook or Instagram may receive more tailored suggestions, based on preferences from Meta’s broader ecosystem.

WhatsApp has also opened the door to subscriptions for exclusive content in Channels. Businesses and creators will be allowed to charge followers a fee for premium updates, with payments processed through app stores. The company has indicated that it will eventually take a percentage of these payments, and that the final cost may vary depending on the platform or size of the business.

Over 1.5 billion people are currently using the Status and Channels features every day, according to Meta. Until now, WhatsApp’s revenue has come mostly from its Business API and click-to-chat ads that link from Facebook or Instagram. These new features represent a shift toward more visible monetization inside the app itself.

While WhatsApp executives describe the move as a natural progression, the company is aware that changes to the app’s quiet interface could draw criticism. In some countries, especially in Europe, WhatsApp is still seen as a messaging-first platform. Some users may not respond positively to the idea of sponsored content appearing near personal content, even if it doesn’t enter the chat interface.

There has already been some backlash over the recent addition of a button for Meta’s AI tool, which cannot be removed from the app. Other tabs, including Channels and Updates, also remain fixed and cannot be hidden. WhatsApp has responded by emphasizing that users who choose not to interact with these features won’t be forced to. If someone uses WhatsApp solely for messaging, they will not see any ads within their inbox.

Despite that reassurance, the direction is clear. Meta is investing in ways to grow revenue within WhatsApp without touching its encrypted core. As people increasingly shift their social activity into private spaces like DMs and temporary stories, Meta appears to be positioning WhatsApp as a quieter, commerce-friendly alternative to its more public platforms.


Read next: 

• Why Changing Jobs Means More Than Just Changing Desks

TikTok Shop Sees Surge in U.S. Activity but Still Trails Its Vision
by Irfan Ahmad via Digital Information World

Why Changing Jobs Means More Than Just Changing Desks

When habits forged in one workplace clash with the culture of the next, even seasoned professionals can trip up.

When Bob Baxley left Apple, he did what many in tech do, he jumped straight into his next role, wasting no time between jobs. But in hindsight, that decision tripped him up. After a Friday farewell at Cupertino, he walked into Pinterest the following Monday, expecting to carry on as usual. What he hadn’t expected was to collide with a different kind of company rhythm.

At Apple, work was intense but clean-cut, Baxley explained this in a recent Lenny's Podcast. Disagreements were normal, even welcomed, so long as the end goal was clarity and excellence. The culture was sharp, well-oiled and quietly unforgiving. It didn’t just shape how people worked, it soaked into their thinking, their timing, even how they spoke in meetings. That way of doing things, honed over years, had become second nature for Baxley.

But Pinterest wasn’t Apple, and it didn’t want to be. The atmosphere there was softer, slower, more reflective. Baxley, still wired for Apple’s pace, quickly found himself out of step. He didn’t fail in the traditional sense, but as he put it, he “bounced off the culture”. He had brought along too much of his old self and hadn’t given the new place enough space to breathe.

It’s a problem that crops up often in tech, especially when people jump from one high-pressure company to another. Cultures at big firms like Apple, Google or Meta aren’t just guidelines, they’re deeply ingrained habits. After a few years, you don’t even realize how much you’ve adapted. You’ve soaked up the norms, how to give feedback, how to push an idea, how to read a meeting room, and those instincts can clash hard with a new environment.

Some people, Baxley noted, manage the switch better than others. One example he pointed to was Hiroki Asai, a former Apple executive who took a break of several years before stepping into his next big role. That pause, deliberate or not, gave him time to unwind old patterns and tune in to a different kind of workplace. It acted, in Baxley’s words, like a second "car wash", a way of rinsing off the mindset of the previous company before taking on something new.

The lesson here isn’t that people should forget what they’ve learned, only that they need to carry it differently. What made someone valuable at one firm might still be an asset, but not if it’s wrapped in the same packaging. Apple, for instance, thrives on detail, polish and a refusal to settle for “good enough”. Those values can serve someone well elsewhere, but only if they’re expressed in a way the new team can hear.

By the time Baxley landed at ThoughtSpot, a later role in his career, he had learned to hold on to the values but leave behind the tone. That meant aiming for excellence but not insisting it arrive in an Apple-shaped box. It meant asking not just “What would Apple do?” but “How do these people work, and how can I meet them where they are?”

For anyone moving between roles, especially in tech where the ground shifts quickly, that kind of recalibration can be the difference between fitting in and falling flat. The temptation to jump straight into the next big thing is strong, but it comes with risk. If you don’t pause and watch, you might miss what’s really going on around you.

Careers rarely unfold like neat ladders. More often they twist and turn, with moments of clarity followed by long spells of trial and error. One role might stretch you, another might humble you. But each stop along the way leaves a mark, and if you're not careful, that mark might shape more than just your resume.

In the end, what matters most is not just where you go, but how well you listen when you get there.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: 

• When Machines Compete, People Trust Their Creative Side More

• TikTok Shop Sees Surge in U.S. Activity but Still Trails Its Vision
by Irfan Ahmad via Digital Information World

Sunday, June 15, 2025

TikTok Shop Sees Surge in U.S. Activity but Still Trails Its Vision

TikTok’s effort to turn scrolling into shopping is picking up speed in the U.S., where the app says user engagement with in-stream purchases has grown quickly in recent months. Yet despite the gains, the company’s broader retail ambitions remain a work in progress.

Over the past year, TikTok has expanded its marketplace to cover more than 750 product categories. It now lists over 70 million items globally, and its U.S. operation has seen a 120% jump in sales compared to the same period last year. Popular purchases include women’s fashion, skincare, electronics, health goods, and sports gear, areas TikTok says reflect changing user interests across the platform.

Short-form videos and livestreams have become the main gateway for discovery. Shoppers are increasingly drawn to creators who showcase how products work, answer questions on the spot, and turn browsing into real-time decision-making. According to figures TikTok cites from market research partner GlobalData, over 8 in 10 TikTok users have come across a new product through the app’s shopping features, while 70% say they’ve discovered new brands they weren’t previously aware of.

That exposure appears to be paying off. More than 8 million hours of live shopping streams were hosted in the U.S. alone over the past year. TikTok claims that nearly three-quarters of users who interacted with its shopping features ended up buying something from one of these livestreams. Small businesses, in particular, are seeing a lift, over 170,000 independent sellers now run shops on the app, and year-on-year sales to U.S. small businesses are reportedly up by 70%.

To support this momentum, TikTok has rolled out a set of new tools aimed at sellers. These include tailored recommendations within its Seller Center dashboard, designed to help vendors fine-tune product listings, improve content, and better connect with interested buyers. A summer promotion titled “Deals for You Days,” running from July 7 to 19, is expected to spotlight deeper discounts and introduce a live price-match program that offers cash-back to viewers who spot lower prices elsewhere.

Still, TikTok’s broader vision for in-stream commerce, modeled after the success of its sister app Douyin in China, hasn’t yet fully materialized in Western markets. While Douyin racked up nearly half a trillion dollars in product sales last year and has become one of China’s biggest ecommerce players, TikTok’s U.S. performance remains modest by comparison. The app saw roughly $6 billion in in-app sales across 2024, a 15% increase from the previous year, but a far cry from Douyin’s scale.

TikTok hopes to replicate Douyin’s model more closely by adding services beyond shopping, such as food delivery and transportation, directly into the app, features that have already gained traction in China. The idea is to embed spending more deeply into the user experience, making TikTok not just a content platform but a full-service digital economy.

However, several hurdles remain. TikTok’s future in the U.S. is uncertain amid ongoing efforts by U.S. lawmakers to force a change in ownership. Internally, the company also overhauled its American commerce team earlier this year after missing 2024 performance targets.

While TikTok’s latest stats paint an optimistic picture, the gap between its current sales footprint and its long-term ambitions remains wide. Whether Western users will fully embrace video-driven shopping as readily as their Chinese counterparts is still an open question, and one TikTok appears determined to answer with deeper discounts, new features, and continued pressure to reshape online retail habits.


Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: TikTok Shop Loses Its Spark as Sellers Face Paid Reality
by Irfan Ahmad via Digital Information World

OpenAI Enhances ChatGPT Search in Ongoing Effort to Challenge Google’s Grip on Web Discovery

OpenAI has rolled out a major upgrade to its ChatGPT Search feature, introducing smarter, more context-aware responses as part of its ongoing push to compete directly with Google in the online search space.

With an estimated 177 million daily visitors, ChatGPT has become a central platform for AI-assisted information access, making improvements to its search functionality especially impactful. The update, which began rolling out on June 13, is designed to deliver more accurate results across a wider range of topics, including real-time data such as news, stock information, and sports scores. Users can now expect more thorough answers that draw from multiple sources, with improved clarity and better alignment to the intent behind each query.

The new version also responds more intelligently during extended chats, reducing the need for repetition and offering continuity in longer interactions. This refinement stems from a clear improvement in how the model interprets and retains context across several turns of conversation.

While OpenAI has not disclosed the exact technical changes behind the update, internal testing showed a clear user preference for the new experience. The search tool now runs multiple queries in the background when tackling more complex questions, making it more effective at breaking down layered prompts without requiring users to rephrase.

Another enhancement allows users to initiate a search by uploading an image, adding a visual layer to the platform’s input methods and expanding the ways users can retrieve information.

Despite the improvements, OpenAI acknowledges that occasional inaccuracies still occur. Users are encouraged to verify the results, particularly when relying on the system for critical or factual information.

This upgrade signals OpenAI’s continued ambition to carve out a space in the consumer search market, one still largely shaped by Google’s longstanding dominance. With a more dynamic and responsive toolset, ChatGPT Search now presents a sharper alternative for users looking to blend conversational interface convenience with real-time information access.
Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: These U.S. States Drive the Trends, Memes, and Moments Filling Your Social Media Timeline
by Irfan Ahmad via Digital Information World

These U.S. States Drive the Trends, Memes, and Moments Filling Your Social Media Timeline

While millions scroll endlessly through short videos and tagged snapshots, a quieter digital map is forming beneath the surface, one shaped not by algorithms, but by geography.

A new ranking has revealed which American states are most active, visible, and commercially positioned on social media. The results show a striking divide between tech-saturated coasts and the offline corners of the country.

New York leads the list. Scoring 78.1 out of 100, it edges out every other state in terms of hashtag traffic and visibility. On Instagram alone, more than 138 million posts reference the Empire State. When adjusted for population, that equals over 700,000 posts per 100,000 residents. No other state comes close to that density of content.

Hawaii follows close behind, with a score of 77.2. It’s not just tourists driving its digital footprint. The state has the highest influencer-per-capita ratio in the country, 0.21 per 100,000 residents. Influencers born in Hawaii are not fringe creators; they sit at the top of their categories globally. Combined with a huge amount of visual content per capita, the state punches well above its population size.

California, in third place at 72.0, has quantity on its side. It hosts 38 of the top 200 influencers examined in the report, more than any other state. However, due to its size, its per capita performance is weaker than both New York and Hawaii. Still, its massive ecosystem of content creators, media firms, and marketing agencies keeps it firmly in the lead pack.

From Likes to Landscapes: How U.S. States Stack Up in Social Media Influence

The analysis, concocted by video editing firm VidPros, used five separate indicators that is the number of major influencers born in each state, volume of Google searches related to social media, number of Instagram and TikTok posts under state hashtags, and the number of digital marketing agencies. Each was assigned a weight before states were scored on a 100-point scale.
The rest of the top ten includes Massachusetts (70.9), Connecticut (70.1), New Jersey (68.5), Florida (64.7), Nevada (61.5), Virginia (61.4), and Utah (59.7). Most are clustered along the East Coast or in tourism-heavy regions. These are states where content tends to circulate widely, often blending influencer marketing with travel and lifestyle appeal.

But further down the list, the numbers shift dramatically.

Alaska, in last place, scored only 15.7. South Dakota followed with 16.9, then West Virginia (17.8), Mississippi (19.2), and North Dakota (20.4). These bottom states share certain traits: sparse populations, fewer marketing firms, low influencer visibility, and little national exposure through content. In Alaska, the number of major influencers born in-state was effectively zero. Instagram posts tagged with #Alaska trail far behind even mid-tier states like Kansas or Nebraska.

Even among states with similar populations, the digital gap is wide. Wyoming, for instance, scored 55.0, over three times higher than Alaska. Its performance was driven by steady per-capita content output and a slightly higher count of influencer activity. Similarly, New Hampshire, a state with modest size, still landed at 57.0 thanks to strong hashtag performance.

All in all, 72 percent of Americans now use social media regularly, according to census-linked data in the report. The average daily screen time related to social platforms stands at just over two hours. These habits translate into economic scale. Influencer marketing is forecast to hit six billion dollars in 2025, while broader social commerce is set to exceed $90 billion. These aren’t background numbers, they reflect the real business value behind everyday scrolling.

From Posts to Popularity: Which U.S. States Influence Your Social Media Feed

Rank State Score - Out Of 100
1 New York 78.1
2 Hawaii 77.2
3 California 72
4 Massachusetts 70.9
5 Connecticut 70.1
6 New Jersey 68.5
7 Florida 64.7
8 Nevada 61.5
9 Virginia 61.4
10 Utah 59.7
11 Oregon 59.5
12 Maryland 58.8
13 New Hampshire 57
14 North Carolina 55.2
15 Wyoming 55
16 Washington 54.9
17 Colorado 53.2
18 Texas 52.6
19 Arizona 50.4
20 Illinois 50.3
21 Ohio 47.6
22 Delaware 47
23 Georgia 46
24 Rhode Island 45.8
25 Tennessee 45.1
26 Pennsylvania 44.5
27 Michigan 43.9
28 Minnesota 42.9
29 Kansas 40.9
30 Louisiana 40.3
31 Nebraska 39.6
32 Oklahoma 39.1
33 Indiana 37.2
34 Vermont 36.9
35 Kentucky 36.8
36 Maine 32.7
37 South Carolina 29.9
38 Wisconsin 29.5
39 Alabama 28
40 Missouri 28
41 Idaho 26.8
42 Iowa 25.9
43 Arkansas 23.5
44 New Mexico 23.1
45 Montana 22.4
46 North Dakota 20.4
47 Mississippi 19.2
48 West Virginia 17.8
49 South Dakota 16.9
50 Alaska 15.7

The results suggest that social media success isn’t just about population. It’s about density, culture, and visibility. States that show up often in visual content, attract creator attention, and maintain a creative workforce tend to score higher. Others, with fewer digital touchpoints or weaker online economies, remain mostly unseen in the feed-driven world.

In short, some states are building the digital future. Others are still catching up.

Read next:

• Study Shows Human Behavior Undermines AI’s Medical Accuracy Outside Test Settings

• Where in the World Are LinkedIn Users Most Likely to Call Themselves CEOs?
by Irfan Ahmad via Digital Information World

Study Shows Human Behavior Undermines AI’s Medical Accuracy Outside Test Settings

AI tools like GPT-4 have been making headlines for passing medical exams and even outperforming licensed doctors in test settings. But new research from the University of Oxford suggests that while AI might shine in test conditions, it often stumbles when actual people rely on it for real health decisions.

A Big Gap Between Test Scores and Real Use

When asked directly, GPT-4 could identify the right diagnosis nearly 95% of the time. But things changed when everyday people tried to use the same tools to figure out what was wrong with them. In that case, the success rate dropped to just under 35%. Oddly enough, people who didn’t use AI at all were more accurate. In fact, they were about 76% more likely to name the correct condition than those using the AI.

How the Study Worked

Oxford researchers brought in 1,298 people to play the role of patients. Each person was given a short medical scenario, that is, a story with symptoms, personal background, and sometimes misleading info. Their task was to decide what might be wrong and what level of care they should seek, ranging from home remedies to calling for an ambulance.
Participants could use one of three AI models, GPT-4o, Llama 3, or Command R+. A group of real doctors had already decided on the correct diagnosis and action plan for each case. One example involved a student who got a sudden, intense headache while out with friends. The right call was a brain scan - he was having a type of brain bleed.

Where Things Went Off Track

When people used the AI tools, they often left out important details. Others misunderstood what the AI told them or ignored it completely. In one case, a person with symptoms of gallstones said they had severe stomach pain after eating takeout but didn’t explain where the pain was or how often it happened. The AI assumed it was indigestion, and the person agreed.
Even when the AI offered helpful information, users didn’t always use it. GPT-4o brought up a correct diagnosis in about two-thirds of cases. But fewer than 35% of users included that condition in their final decision.

How Human Behavior Changes the Outcome

Experts say this result isn’t shocking. AI needs clear, detailed input to do its job well. But someone who feels sick or panicked often can’t explain their symptoms clearly. Unlike trained doctors who know how to ask the right follow-up questions, an AI can only respond to what it's told.

Also, trust plays a role. People might not believe the AI’s advice or fully understand what it says. These human factors can limit how useful AI is in real life.

Why Test Scores Can Be Misleading

One lesson from the study is that high scores on standard tests don’t mean a model is ready for the real world. Most of these exams are made for humans, not machines. They don’t test how well an AI handles unclear input, emotional responses, or vague wording.

Think of a chatbot trained to answer customer service questions. It might do well on practice quizzes, but struggle with real users who type casually or express frustration. Without live testing with real people, those perfect scores don’t mean much.

AI Talking to AI Isn’t the Same

Oxford researchers also tried letting one AI act like a patient and another give the advice. These AI-to-AI conversations did better, about 61% of the time, the “patient” AI guessed the right problem. But this success is a bit of a trick. It shows that AI tools work well with each other, not necessarily with humans.

It’s Not the User’s Fault

Some might think users are to blame for the AI failures. But user experience experts say the real problem lies in design. If people can’t get the right help, it’s a sign the system isn’t built to match how people think or behave.

The study offers a clear warning: strong performance in a quiet lab doesn’t equal success in the messiness of real life. For any AI meant to work with people, testing with people is essential. Otherwise, we risk building smart tools that fall flat when it matters most.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next:

• From OpenAI's o3 to Grok-3 Vision: These AI Models Took the Mensa Test, Results May Surprise You

• The Hidden Cost of Free AI Tools: Your Behavior, Habits, and Identity

• Apple’s AI Critique Faces Pushback Over Flawed Testing Methods
by Irfan Ahmad via Digital Information World

Saturday, June 14, 2025

The Hidden Cost of Free AI Tools: Your Behavior, Habits, and Identity

Like it or not, artificial intelligence has become part of daily life. Many devices – including electric razors and toothbrushes – have become “AI-powered,” using machine learning algorithms to track how a person uses the device, how the device is working in real time, and provide feedback. From asking questions to an AI assistant like ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot to monitoring a daily fitness routine with a smartwatch, many people use an AI system or tool every day.

While AI tools and technologies can make life easier, they also raise important questions about data privacy . These systems often collect large amounts of data, sometimes without people even realizing their data is being collected. The information can then be used to identify personal habits and preferences, and even predict future behaviors by drawing inferences from the aggregated data.

As an assistant professor of cybersecurity at West Virginia University, I study how emerging technologies and various types of AI systems manage personal data and how we can build more secure, privacy-preserving systems for the future.

Generative AI software uses large amounts of training data to create new content such as text or images. Predictive AI uses data to forecast outcomes based on past behavior, such as how likely you are to hit your daily step goal, or what movies you may want to watch. Both types can be used to gather information about you.

How AI tools collect data

Generative AI assistants such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini collect all the information users type into a chat box. Every question, response and prompt that users enter is recorded, stored and analyzed to improve the AI model.

OpenAI’s privacy policy informs users that “we may use content you provide us to improve our Services, for example to train the models that power ChatGPT.” Even though OpenAI allows you to opt out of content use for model training, it still collects and retains your personal data . Although some companies promise that they anonymize this data, meaning they store it without naming the person who provided it, there is always a risk of data being reidentified.

ChatGPT stores and analyzes everything you type into a prompt screen. Screenshot by Christopher Ramezan, CC BY-ND

Predictive AI

Beyond generative AI assistants, social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and TikTok continuously gather data on their users to train predictive AI models. Every post, photo, video, like, share and comment, including the amount of time people spend looking at each of these, is collected as data points that are used to build digital data profiles for each person who uses the service.

The profiles can be used to refine the social media platform’s AI recommender systems . They can also be sold to data brokers, who sell a person’s data to other companies to, for instance, help develop targeted advertisements that align with that person’s interests.

Many social media companies also track users across websites and applications by putting cookies and embedded tracking pixels on their computers. Cookies are small files that store information about who you are and what you clicked on while browsing a website.

One of the most common uses of cookies is in digital shopping carts: When you place an item in your cart, leave the website and return later, the item will still be in your cart because the cookie stored that information. Tracking pixels are invisible images or snippets of code embedded in websites that notify companies of your activity when you visit their page. This helps them track your behavior across the internet.

This is why users often see or hear advertisements that are related to their browsing and shopping habits on many of the unrelated websites they browse, and even when they are using different devices, including computers, phones and smart speakers. One study found that some websites can store over 300 tracking cookies on your computer or mobile phone.

Here’s how websites you browse can track you using cookies or tracking pixels.

Data privacy controls – and limitations

Like generative AI platforms, social media platforms offer privacy settings and opt-outs, but these give people limited control over how their personal data is aggregated and monetized . As media theorist Douglas Rushkoff argued in 2011, if the service is free, you are the product.

Many tools that include AI don’t require a person to take any direct action for the tool to collect data about that person. Smart devices such as home speakers, fitness trackers and watches continually gather information through biometric sensors, voice recognition and location tracking. Smart home speakers continually listen for the command to activate or “ wake up ” the device. As the device is listening for this word, it picks up all the conversations happening around it , even though it does not seem to be active.

Some companies claim that voice data is only stored when the wake word – what you say to wake up the device – is detected. However, people have raised concerns about accidental recordings, especially because these devices are often connected to cloud services , which allow voice data to be stored, synced and shared across multiple devices such as your phone, smart speaker and tablet.

If the company allows, it’s also possible for this data to be accessed by third parties, such as advertisers, data analytics firms or a law enforcement agency with a warrant.

Privacy rollbacks

This potential for third-party access also applies to smartwatches and fitness trackers, which monitor health metrics and user activity patterns. Companies that produce wearable fitness devices are not considered “covered entities” and so are not bound by the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act . This means that they are legally allowed to sell health- and location-related data collected from their users.

Concerns about HIPAA data arose in 2018, when Strava, a fitness company released a global heat map of user’s exercise routes. In doing so, it accidentally revealed sensitive military locations across the globe through highlighting the exercise routes of military personnel.

The Trump administration has tapped Palantir , a company that specializes in using AI for data analytics, to collate and analyze data about Americans. Meanwhile, Palantir has announced a partnership with a company that runs self-checkout systems .

Such partnerships can expand corporate and government reach into everyday consumer behavior. This one could be used to create detailed personal profiles on Americans by linking their consumer habits with other personal data. This raises concerns about increased surveillance and loss of anonymity. It could allow citizens to be tracked and analyzed across multiple aspects of their lives without their knowledge or consent.

Some smart device companies are also rolling back privacy protections instead of strengthening them. Amazon recently announced that starting on March 28, 2025, all voice recordings from Amazon Echo devices would be sent to Amazon’s cloud by default, and users will no longer have the option to turn this function off. This is different from previous settings, which allowed users to limit private data collection.

Changes like these raise concerns about how much control consumers have over their own data when using smart devices. Many privacy experts consider cloud storage of voice recordings a form of data collection, especially when used to improve algorithms or build user profiles, which has implications for data privacy laws designed to protect online privacy.

Implications for data privacy

All of this brings up serious privacy concerns for people and governments on how AI tools collect, store, use and transmit data. The biggest concern is transparency. People don’t know what data is being collected, how the data is being used, and who has access to that data.

Companies tend to use complicated privacy policies filled with technical jargon to make it difficult for people to understand the terms of a service that they agree to. People also tend not to read terms of service documents. One study found that people averaged 73 seconds reading a terms of service document that had an average read time of 29-32 minutes.

Data collected by AI tools may initially reside with a company that you trust, but can easily be sold and given to a company that you don’t trust.

AI tools, the companies in charge of them and the companies that have access to the data they collect can also be subject to cyberattacks and data breaches that can reveal sensitive personal information. These attacks can by carried out by cybercriminals who are in it for the money, or by so-called advanced persistent threats , which are typically nation/state- sponsored attackers who gain access to networks and systems and remain there undetected, collecting information and personal data to eventually cause disruption or harm.

While laws and regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation in the European Union and the California Consumer Privacy Act aim to safeguard user data, AI development and use have often outpaced the legislative process. The laws are still catching up on AI and data privacy . For now, you should assume any AI-powered device or platform is collecting data on your inputs, behaviors and patterns.

Using AI tools

Although AI tools collect people’s data, and the way this accumulation of data affects people’s data privacy is concerning, the tools can also be useful. AI-powered applications can streamline workflows, automate repetitive tasks and provide valuable insights.

But it’s crucial to approach these tools with awareness and caution.

When using a generative AI platform that gives you answers to questions you type in a prompt, don’t include any personally identifiable information , including names, birth dates, Social Security numbers or home addresses. At the workplace, don’t include trade secrets or classified information. In general, don’t put anything into a prompt that you wouldn’t feel comfortable revealing to the public or seeing on a billboard. Remember, once you hit enter on the prompt, you’ve lost control of that information.

Remember that devices which are turned on are always listening – even if they’re asleep. If you use smart home or embedded devices, turn them off when you need to have a private conversation. A device that’s asleep looks inactive, but it is still powered on and listening for a wake word or signal. Unplugging a device or removing its batteries is a good way of making sure the device is truly off.

Finally, be aware of the terms of service and data collection policies of the devices and platforms that you are using. You might be surprised by what you’ve already agreed to.

This post was first published on TheConversation.

Read next: Apple’s AI Critique Faces Pushback Over Flawed Testing Methods


by Web Desk via Digital Information World