Wednesday, September 4, 2024

Survey Reveals Top and Bottom Performers in Junior Employee Satisfaction: Salesforce and Google Lead, Amazon Trails

When you’re starting in a new company with very little experience, you’re given the tag of being a junior employee. This not only comes with the added burden of performing well under pressure but also means longer work hours and doing the worst tasks with very little in return.

Many are exploited without realizing it because they focus solely on getting a decent paycheck to pay their dues.

Understanding how companies work can best be seen in how junior employees are treated. This can guide other aspirants who wish to join the same workplace. Thanks to a new survey conducted by ResumeIO which took into consideration 22,095 junior employee satisfaction reviews, we’ve got more insights on 54 leading companies.

While many ambitious employees are given a clear-cut vision of what their next job will be like and how the company works, the reality can be very different from that portrayed. We’re not saying all are bad but some are certainly not as good as others.

Many junior workers must learn the hard way related to how industries work by a simple ‘pay your dues’ culture. This means doing your share of tasks while you figure out your dedication. Sadly, many are getting exploited on such a huge level. Some manage to excel as they’re built for it while others succumb to the pressure and face burnout and bitterness.

Moving on to the report’s key findings, we’ve got plenty to say. Salesforce scored 4.6 out of 5 while Google came in second with 4.53 and Microsoft third with 4.52. They’re undoubtedly the top three places that people would like to work when they’re new in the industry and the satisfaction reviews are proof of just that. Juniors rated Tesla scored 0.77 points higher than more senior employees.

Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about tech giant Amazon. It had the lowest average rating for junior employees which is 4.05. Meanwhile, levels in America fell 6% between the years 2020 and 2023 while there was a 0.8% rise this year.

Tech firms led the race for the greatest level of junior employee satisfaction. We saw Salesforce has the best reviews with an average of 4.65 across all junior positions on Glassdoor.

Meanwhile, companies involved in the retail and fast food industry were among the top ones to dominate for all the wrong reasons. Yes, people felt this might be the worst sector to be in when you’re starting off your career with very little experience.

Amongst the lowest rated firms included Whole Foods, Walmart, McDonald’s, Starbucks, and even Burger King. Still, the worst one based on the study is IT company DXC. it had an average score of 3.28.

Among the tech companies with the best reviews, aspiring individuals often dream of working for leading firms like Google and Apple. This is as per findings seen on a recent survey by Axios and Generation Lab where college students took part.

Six out of 10 most desirable locations to work are big tech organizations. Out of them all, it’s Google had the best reviews for junior employee satisfaction, followed by Microsoft as discussed at the start.

The reason why Google is hailed by juniors is how much it offers in return for being a part of its workforce. From a wide array of development opportunities to great areas to excel in terms of mentorship, the list of benefits is huge.

Other than that, it maintains a massively diverse workforce. As a young working professional, what more can one ask for that’s why Gen Z cannot get enough of the company.

Meanwhile, when you compare that with senior experience, it’s Tesla that shaped up to be the best for younger workers with a lack of experience. Some went as far as to score it 4.39 stars while seniors gave it just 3.61

To conclude, the consensus that junior employees don’t like to do a lot of work does not always stand true. Instead, they’re given work that’s not only less enjoyable but more in quantity when compared to the pay scale offered at the start. This results in lower job satisfaction.

Take a look at below infographic for more insights:

Tech companies like Salesforce and Google top junior satisfaction ratings; Amazon ranks lowest among surveyed firms.





Read next: A New Survey Shows What iPhone and Android Users Think of Each Other
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

Tuesday, September 3, 2024

The Social Media App Everyone’s Flocking To: Reddit’s Astonishing Rise in User Engagement!

According to Comscore Mobile Metrix, Reddit is surpassing many social media apps in terms of engagements. Reddit has experienced a rise in average time spent monthly, from 215.3 minutes to 243.0 minutes between June 2023 and June 2024. The reason why Reddit is getting so many engagements is because it is providing a niche community for all types of discussions. Users are liking how they can read and discuss all types of topics on the app. Emarketer predicts that an 11% increase in average time spent is expected by Reddit this year.

There are also some other factors which are making Reddit better than other apps. In addition to the content that appeals to all types of audience which has contributed to 50% increase in daily active users YoY in Q2, the company is also focusing on its ad offering. Reddit has expanded its agency partnerships which has boosted its ad revenues to 41% in Q2 of 2024. Reddit is going to expand further in the upcoming days because of its search capabilities with AI driven search enhancements.

Among US adults, 7.8% of their daily time is spent on Reddit while it generates 0.9% of the social ad spend. This means that it has much room to grow. On the other hand, Facebook has the most monthly time spent per user but is seeing some decline, right along with Instagram. Meta’s Messenger app saw some increase in the monthly time spent. It went from 171.8 minutes in June 2023 to 203.0 minutes in June 2024.

TikTok also saw some decrease, growing from 429.2 minutes in June 2023 to 406.4 minutes in June 2024. WhatsApp, X and Snapchat haven’t seen any prominent rise or decline in average monthly time spent by users. Overall, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok are still taking most of the users’ time but Reddit has seen some nice growth.


Read next: Apple Tops the List of Ten Best Selling Smartphones in Q2 of 2024
by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World

Bombshell Leak Reveals Facebook’s Marketing Partners Listen To Users’ Smartphone Microphones

A concerning new leak has Facebook’s marketing partners discussing a shocking situation. This includes eavesdropping on users’ conversations.

The reason is simple. They’re using it to grasp users’ needs and wants and then target them specifically with ads related to that. But the question on our minds is if that’s even legal as we’re not aware of entering into any such agreement.

The news comes to us thanks to 404 Media who put the matter into the spotlight. Based on documents rolled out to reporters, the leaks come from news and radio giant Cox Media Group. They’re heard bragging about a software dubbed Active Listening that makes use of AI to capture real-time data by listening to chats.

Advertisers are pairing the voice data with behavioral data to better approach the market.

We also hear about CMG adding some more bombshell names from the tech world that make use of similar practices. Common examples include Google, Facebook, as well as Amazon. These are all clients that become a part of the Active Listening service.

When 404 reached out for more details and to confirm if the matter was even true, Google’s response was a shocker. It removed the media house from its list of partner programs. This further led to Meta admitting that it was in the process of carrying out a review to see if any violations were made to its Terms of Service.

Moving on to Amazon, it blatantly denied the allegations and spoke about how CMG never worked with the company and would like to keep it that way for the near future. Still, if any marketing partners were found guilty of the act, they would be brought to justice for violations.

The latest revelations mark this as three time in a row that we’ve seen 404 media reports on the shady behavior of using voice service to target clients. In the past year, the independent news website put the marketing firm on blast for promoting creepy technology through a podcast. Knowing that this listening feature does exist is so sad.

Combined with the new update, the stories are giving rise to a lot of suspicions related to advertisers using phones to listen to users without consent. It’s like privacy has gone out of the window.

The question on people’s minds is whether or not this behavior is legal or not. The answer is that it’s legal for devices to listen to you because when you make downloads or updates for apps, it’s mentioned in fine print somewhere about this. You’ll see Active Listening as a part of this list.

CMG failed to acknowledge how it took on the voice data. It just identified those who were ready to purchase and hence made targeted lists for those individuals depending on what their interests were.

They are charging up to $100 each day and $200 if you’re a little further from reach like the 20-mile radius. The fact that CMG is not replying to many media outlets who are bombarding them with common questions like how is this possible and what techniques it uses to carry out active listening is questionable.

If you cannot reply, then don’t give hope to others that it’s still very possible. And if you are standing by your claims, please be strong enough to support them. Active listening is very creepy and really puts a big question mark on users’ safety and privacy in the world of advancing tech.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: Apple’s Hypocrisy Unraveled: The Company Spends Millions To Lobby Against Child Safety Mandates
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

Apple’s Hypocrisy Unraveled: The Company Spends Millions To Lobby Against Child Safety Mandates

At first glance, it might appear that tech giant Apple is adding new ways to reduce the addiction that comes with smartphone usage. However, a new report is shedding light on another concerning finding.

At one end of the spectrum, we have Apple spending millions to lobby against child safety mandates. This means killing bills promoting the safety of minors.

Thanks to the Wall Street Journal, we saw reports related to several American states trying to control smartphone usage by teenagers. To be more specific, one report details about Louisiana. Issues had to do with a bill requiring Apple to include age restrictions via the App Store. This way, individual apps would no longer be in charge of age limits.

Meta also found that an appealing decision and sided with the discussion as there would be a single place for parents to control social media rather than run around different apps for the same ordeal. Apple was included in this legislation and within no time, many from Apple made it clear that this was not the right call.

Many Apple lobbyists referred to this as the poison pill from Meta, a way to deflect attention from different challenges linked to child safety that the company was facing.

The rep added Apple was providing parental controls and outlining age details with various third-party platforms and hence sharing age-related information would be their privacy violation.

This means the bill might get into a lot of trouble and the state might be in even more trouble as the company could face legal action for getting on board with App Store requirements.

In the end, no requirement was included in the bill to include Apple’s App Store and it crossed the Senate with ease. We are yet to hear from Apple’s lobbyists about the matter but those who did come across the news simply mentioned that other states didn’t want it either.

In reality, Apple’s parental controls don’t stand where they should be. While the iPhone maker wishes to spend less in terms of lobbying as compared to Meta and Amazon, it’s still spending millions. Today, lobbyists are going as far as to offer investments in state education. The price is dropping legislations linked to the App Store.


Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: Apple Tops the List of Ten Best Selling Smartphones in Q2 of 2024
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

Apple Tops the List of Ten Best Selling Smartphones in Q2 of 2024

As Q2 2024 is over, the smartphone market has seen some rise in its global shipment. There’s a list of top ten best selling smartphones, according to Global Smartphone Model Sales Tracker. Even though Samsung is dominating the top ten list, iPhone is still at the top in Q2 2024. Apple’s iPhone 15 was the best selling smartphone in Q2 2024. Overall, Apple secured 4 spots in the top ten list, while Samsung secured 5 spots.

Most of iPhone 15’s sales were seen in regions like LATAM and APAC, while iPhone 15 Pro Max moved down to the second spot in Q2. iPhone 15 Pro was the third most sold smartphone in Q2 2024. It was the third best selling smartphone in Q1 of 2024 too.

Samsung’s A15 5G was the fourth best selling smartphone in Q2, while A15 4G was the fifth best selling. Samsung’s GenAI capabilities of S24 series made the smartphone popular among users, plus the availability of Samsung in wider regions also made Samsung models best selling. Samsung A05 was the eighth best selling smartphone in Q2. Samsung’s affordable prices also contributed to the sales.

Xiaomi made it to the top ten best selling list after a year. Its Redmi 13C model was the seventh best selling smartphone in Q2 of 2024. It was easily accessible to many regions and MEA and LATAM saw an increase in its sales. Out of ten smartphones, six smartphones which were best selling in Q2 of 2024 belong to the premium price band. This shows that many users prefer using premium smartphones.


Read next: How Smart Home Apps Are Compromising User Privacy with Excessive Data Collection
by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World

Monday, September 2, 2024

What’s Behind the 43% Rise in Crypto Scams? “Pig Butchering” Takes Center Stage!

According to a new report by Chainalysis, a blockchain analysis company, a scam known as "pig butchering" is on the rise. In this scam, victims are often lured into fake romantic relationships, where they are persuaded to make large investments. Once the money is invested, the scammers disappear. This year alone, scammers based in Myanmar have stolen $101.22 million using this tactic. Other scams, like address poisoning, drainers, and work-from-home schemes, are also becoming more common.

Scammers typically attract their victims through social media and dating apps like Tinder, Facebook, and Match.com. The report shows a 43% increase in these types of scams this year, with most of the stolen funds being transferred to wallets that were newly created in 2024. By comparison, only 30% of stolen funds went to wallets opened in 2022.



The duration of these scams is also changing. As technology advances, the lifespan of a typical scam is getting shorter, dropping from an average of 271 days to just 42 days. This reduction may be due to increased enforcement and stablecoin issuers blacklisting scam addresses.

Data from Immunefi supports the idea that criminal activity in the crypto market is decreasing, with losses dropping nearly twenty-fold in August compared to previous months. This decline is partly because no significant hacks have been reported in August so far. However, there was a notable exception in July, when the crypto exchange WazirX was hacked, resulting in a loss of $230 million.


Read next: New Study Shows Students Who Use AI Are Less Productive and Have Low Chances to Succeed in the Future
by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World

How Smart Home Apps Are Compromising User Privacy with Excessive Data Collection

In a world dominated by technology, the idea of privacy has quietly slipped away. Surfshark's Research Hub talks about "Smart Home Privacy," which reveals how many home security apps disregard user privacy and often collect too much personal data without consent. The study shows that a security camera app can be one of the biggest collectors of user data.

Surfshark reveals that an outdoor security camera apps can gather your phone numbers, email addresses, location and payment information. Many other smart home apps can also do the same thing. But an outdoor security camera app can collect your information 50% more than any other smart home apps. The outdoor security camera apps which were analyzed took 7 out of 12 data points to the users’ identity.

The indoor security camera apps can also collect your data but less than outdoor security camera apps. On average, they collect 9 data points, out of which 6 are linked to the user's identity. These data points include email addresses, user IDs, purchase histories, audio data and phone numbers. These indoor and outdoor security camera apps also gather names, physical addresses and other contact information of users which can be used to contact users outside the app.

There are some outdoor apps which gather the most user information like LOREX and Deep Sentinel. These two apps collect 18 out of 32 data points which link to the user's identity. The indoor security app, Nest Lab, gathers 17 data points linked to users, followed by Ring and Arlo Apps. Both of these apps collect 15 data points. If no regulations and standards are implemented on these data apps, they can pose a lot of risks and threats to users including cyber attacks, data breaches and physical harm. After collecting the data, these apps give that data to data brokers or third party companies which can bring a lot of harm to users.

Privacy Concerns Rise as Smart Home Apps Gather Extensive User Data

Read next:

• Google’s AI Overviews Are Deeply Impacting Publisher Visibility On Search, New Study Shows

• Google Trends Researching Made Easy: Unlock Expert-Level Insights with These Simple Tips
by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World