Wednesday, February 28, 2024

YouTube Unveils "Create" App Expansion: Editing Tools and Features for Creators In More Regions

YouTube has exciting news for content creators. The tech giant unveils its "Create" video editing app expansion, tailored for Shorts content production. Initially introduced at the "Made On" showcase event last September, "YouTube Create" offers an array of features to facilitate intricate video compositions.

Among its editing functionalities are audio clean-up, eliminating background disturbances, and auto captions in English, Hindi, and Spanish. Additionally, creators gain access to filters, effects, and transitions on a simplified interface. Moreover, a diverse library of royalty-free music tracks and sound effects is available, alongside direct publishing to YouTube for both Shorts and long-form content.

Amidst this expansion, users in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Finland, Hong Kong, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey gain access to the tool starting today. 

"YouTube Create" mirrors CapCut, offering a comprehensive toolkit to personalize and optimize visual narratives. Its indispensable features aim to enhance the allure and impact of video clips.
While currently exclusive to Android users, accessibility extends beyond geographical boundaries. Initially available in India, Singapore, the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, South Korea, and Indonesia, the platform plans to roll out access to more regions over time.

For eligible markets and Android users, acquisition of the app is effortless through the Play Store. Embark on your creative journey today and unlock the boundless potential within YouTube Create.

Image: DIW-AIgen

Read next: YouTube Rolls Out New ‘Collab’ Tool For Shorts As Competition With TikTok Heats Up
by Asim BN via Digital Information World

How App Marketers Are Responding to ATT and Other Privacy Frameworks

App marketers are still feeling the impact of COVID-19 today. What started with exponential growth as millions of consumers flocked to business, e-commerce, and gaming apps has stabilized. But just as consumer habits change, so do privacy regulations that dictate the user information accessible to app marketers.

Whether it’s Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT), recent SKAdNetwork (SKAN) 4 changes, or Google’s upcoming shift from Google Advertising ID (GAID) to its Privacy Sandbox, changes such as these can significantly impact ad performance and how marketers report and measure their campaigns.

How are app marketers responding? Is ATT still causing problems? Are marketers wising up to the implications of SKAN 4? And with GAID deprecation looming, are app marketers fully prepared for these changes? Or perhaps more importantly, do they understand how these changes affect them and their campaigns?

To find out, we asked more than 500 app marketing professionals from top companies worldwide to share how they’re responding to pivotal mobile ecosystem challenges, such as user privacy, cost, and macroeconomic factors. You can find the full findings in Liftoff’s 2024 App Marketer Survey*. However, we wanted to look deeper at app marketers’ sentiments around user privacy to see how the industry is progressing and where marketers can improve.

ATT is still impacting UA performance


According to AppsFlyer, average opt-in rates hover at about 45% in the second year of ATT, although rates can vary significantly across app verticals, with shopping apps reporting at 82%.

With that in mind, it’s unsurprising to hear many app marketers are still dealing with the repercussions of ATT. When we asked app marketers how ATT changes had impacted their overall UA performance, the responses were:
  • Very negatively (9%)
  • Slightly negatively (35%)
  • No change (33%)
  • Slightly positively (20%)
  • Very positively (4%)
To break this down further, we asked app marketers whether they agreed or disagreed with some of the most commonly cited ATT challenges, such as increasing costs, changing KPIs, and a lack of available data hindering decision-making.

As we can see from the chart above, two of the biggest challenges are a need for more available data hindering decision-making (71% agree), costs increasing (68%), and campaigns being less successful (62%).

App marketers can combat these challenges by:
  • Adding more transparent messaging on their apps about data collection and privacy to improve opt-in rates
  • Focusing on campaign optimization with in-app advertising optimization to increase ROAS
  • Working with DSPs with an established network of high-quality users to bring down costs

Over a third of app marketers are still unfamiliar with SKAN 4


While 66% of app marketers reported at least some familiarity with SKAN 4, it’s concerning that over a third of respondents are not familiar. Though this is an improvement on last year’s survey, where more than half of respondents weren’t familiar with SKAN 4, many app marketers seem to be struggling to embrace SKAN 4, or are unaware of its benefits.

For the unfamiliar, SKAN allows advertisers to receive up to three postbacks based on a different activity window: 0-2 days, 3-7 days, and 8-35 days. This makes it easier to gauge the effectiveness of ad campaigns after 35 days, giving you more options for optimization and reporting. Our advice: Read up and change tactics if you need to.

Marketers are cautious but not unwilling to share unattributed postbacks


Speaking of campaign optimization, unattributed postbacks are a great way to gather valuable information and improve campaign performance. While they don’t include attribution data, they do include conversion data, which might be why more than half of the app marketers we surveyed don’t share unattributed postbacks with their partners.

That said, 38% of respondents do share unattributed postbacks or would do so with a partner if asked, highlighting that while app marketers are cautious about the information they share, they are willing to provide it to the right partners when they recognize the benefits, such as optimizing campaign performance by allowing ad networks to determine CPI billing more accurately.

Over half of marketers have made little or no preparations for GAID deprecation


When Google says goodbye to GAID potentially this year, it will change audience targeting, emphasize interest-based ad serving over traditional personalization methods, and introduce an API for attribution reporting.

In short, Google will make it more difficult for app marketers to get the information they rely on for Android campaign optimization. Despite this, our survey found that a third (33%) of respondents are unfamiliar with GAID, while 30% are only somewhat familiar and 27% are very or extremely familiar. Familiarity aside, there was also a notable lack of preparation for incoming changes, with more than half of app marketers saying they have made very little or no preparation for GAID deprecation.

Preparing for these changes now will stand you in good stead, as it gives you a headstart of knowing what and how you need to change campaign activations and performance, as well as targetting and any tweaks to creative you might need to make.

*The Liftoff 2023 App Marketer Survey was conducted October 25–November 21, 2023. It’s based on over 500 responses from global app marketing professionals across gaming (54%) and non-gaming (46%) app verticals, with respondents based in APAC (27%), the Americas (32%), and EMEA (41%). Respondents work with monthly advertising budgets from $50,000 to over $1,000,000.

Written by: Joey Fulcher, Global VP, Accelerate at Liftoff

Read next: 10 Most Popular Social Media Titans: Top Platforms of 2024
by Web Desk via Digital Information World

From Syria to Senegal: the 10 countries that searched for VPNs most in 2023

Looking at global statistics around VPN (Virtual Private Network) usage, it’s easy to build up a picture of the average VPN user.

They’re probably male (57% of VPN users are), with an income of $25,000 to $49,000; most likely degree-educated, too. The latest data also tells us what those people are using VPNs for: namely, to protect their privacy on public wifi (51%), safeguard their browsing anonymity (44%), communicate securely (37%), and mask their browsing from authorities (Techopedia).

But recently, research has demonstrated that it’s not just who you are that determines whether, or how, you use a VPN. It’s where you are in the world, too.

So – which countries serve as the highest predictors for VPN usage? In which parts of the planet were searches for VPNs most fervent and frequent in 2023 – and, perhaps, most importantly, why?

Let’s take a look.

Which 10 countries searched for VPNs most in 2023?

In Techopedia’s guide to the countries that searched for VPNs most, it analyzed Google Trends data. The goal? To ascertain which countries had the highest proportion of VPN-related online searches (as a proportion of total searches) in 2023 – and how much these had increased compared to 2022’s figures.

The findings revealed that the countries most interested in VPNs in 2023 were:
  1. Turkmenistan
  2. Ethiopia
  3. Iran
  4. Myanmar
  5. China
  6. Syria
  7. Afghanistan
  8. St Helena
  9. Senegal
  10. Uganda
Almost invariably, these countries are under the thumb of governments (typically, totalitarian ones) with a penchant for internet censorship; whether that’s China’s blanket ban, or the more selective, reactive approach countries like Senegal and Uganda take to combat civil crises.

Below, we unpack the top three talking points from Techopedia’s VPN findings – and what’s happening in those countries to have caused VPN usage to spike so dramatically.

Afghanistan’s VPN searches are the fastest-growing

In Techopedia’s research, all but three of the countries in the top 10 for VPN searches saw an increase in online VPN-related queries vis a vis 2022 levels. (The three outliers were Turkmenistan, which stayed consistent, plus Ethiopia and Senegal – both of which were new entrants in the rankings.)

Myanmar observed a 27% increase in VPN interest, while St Helena – a remote British territory located almost 2,000 km off the coast of southwestern Africa – saw a 60% boost. Familiar culprits such as Iran and China (both +93%) saw even greater growth in VPN searches, as did Uganda (+106%) and war-torn Syria (+108%).

But the most jaw-dropping increase in 2023 VPN searches compared to the year prior – and by some margin – was in Afghanistan, where VPN-related queries grew a staggering 156%.

How come?

Since the Taliban seized power in 2021, the country – and its internet – has remained in the lethal grip of the militant group’s forces. Since then, Afghanistan’s relationship with online freedoms has been a complex one. Early in the Taliban’s reign, the Pashtun organization imposed an outright ban on the internet, although this soon gave way to a more lenient approach – perhaps after the Taliban realized that they could turn the internet into a weapon.

They soon set about doing that, and 2022 saw the group block 23 million websites: surgically and strategically severing its citizens’ access to anything it leaders deemed ‘anti-Islamic content’. To this day, the militant group also monitors social media for posts expressing similar views or ‘immorality’ – or, indeed, simply anything anti-Taliban.

However, Afghanistan’s stringent internet controls haven’t yet made their way into the realm of law – and in 2024, VPNs remain legal to use in Afghanistan.

Turkmenistan has the highest proportion of VPN searches

Techopedia’s research found that, while internet searches for VPNs in 2023 grew most in Afghanistan, they were highest (as a proportion of all online queries) in Turkmenistan – a position the country also held in 2022.

To those already familiar with Turkmenistan’s overzealous approach to policing the internet, this comes as no surprise. This central Asian country’s internet is widely considered to be the most censored in the world, with a dictator-led government controlling the flow of information through a sole internet provider.

That, of course, is for Turkmen citizens who have access to the internet – most don’t.

Turkmenistan's internet penetration rate of 38.2% is central Asia’s lowest. Further complicating the picture is the fact that VPNs – the main method the country’s internet users have of circumventing its government’s iron fist on information – are illegal.

That’s right: Turkmenistan is one of a mere handful of countries (which also includes North Korea, Iraq, Belarus, and Oman) to outlaw VPNs altogether. Among the punishments to be handed out to offenders? Cautions, fines – and lengthy prison sentences.

Yet, if the latest data is anything to go by, that hasn’t deterred Turkmenistan’s internet users from seeking out VPNs to restore their access to unfiltered internet.

Senegal’s VPN demand spike was the largest in 2023

Despite Senegal only entering Techopedia’s rankings in 2023, it did so with a bang – placing a global ninth for VPN-related searches that year.

Leading the west African country’s surge into the standings was a remarkable 60,000% increase in VPN demand in 2023 – the biggest uptick of the year, and one made all the more extraordinary by the fact it took place in a single month, from June to July.

So, what happened?

In brief, Senegal’s VPN uptick can be traced back to the fate of Ousmane Sonko – the leader of the country’s opposing party, PASTEF – who was sentenced in June 2023 to two years in prison by a court, on the charge of “corrupting youth”. The judgment was immediately denounced by Sonko’s supporters, who branded it a plot to prevent the politician running for election the following February.

Violent clashes broke out, leaving nine dead – and it wasn’t the first time violence had gripped the country that year. A mere month earlier, protests in the Senegalese capital, Dakar, killed one and wounded 30, with those involved pushing back against the state’s increasingly repressive attitude towards its citizens. (Schoolchildren demanding schools to be built, rather than police stations, were met in the streets by police kitted out in full riot attire.)

The Senegalese government – in response to this string of high-profile clashes and ever-increasing public dissent against it – shut down social media. Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and WhatsApp all disappeared, and VPN searches in the country exploded. Despite these bans being lifted just a week later, recent developments in Senegal’s ongoing struggles suggest that Senegal’s first appearance in VPN searches’ global top 10 won’t be its last.

In February 2024, Senegal’s president, Macky Sall, postponed the country’s elections (scheduled for that month) to December. In the aftermath, three people were killed in bloody clashes between protestors and police, and Sall’s government (one with a history of internet censorship that far predates June 2023’s social media blacklists) pulled the plug on mobile data, citing “the dissemination on social networks of several subversive hate messages.”

Senegal’s late entrance into the global top 10 for VPN searches suggests that, when it comes to circumventing online censorship, its internet users are relatively late to the party.

But, if their relationship with VPNs isn’t such a longstanding one now, it certainly promises to be going forward – so watch this space.

VPNs and internet freedom: a crystal-clear correlation

While the correlation between VPN usage and low levels of internet freedom has always felt, intuitively, to be strong, only recently have we had the data to prove it.

That’s because Techopedia’s findings map neatly with data from Freedom House’s Freedom of the Net Report 2023, which measures the extent to which the internet is freely available and unrestricted in 70 countries. According to Freedom House, the least free internets are those in:
  1. China (9/100)
  2. Myanmar (10/100)
  3. Iran (11/100)
  4. Cuba (20/100)
  5. Russia (21/100)
  6. Vietnam (22/100)
  7. Belarus (25/100)
  8. Saudi Arabia (25/100)
  9. Uzbekistan (25/100)
  10. Ethiopia (26/100)
So in total, four of the 10 countries with the most obfuscated online environments – China, Myanmar, Iran, and Ethiopia – are also those where VPN searches are continuing to soar.

And one thing is clear. As governments in these countries conduct their ongoing flirtations with increasingly authoritative and oppressive approaches to rule, internet freedoms are emerging as a key battleground; and VPNs a major player.

Looking to the future, how VPNs are accessed and used will continue to be a major avenue of escape for internet users in countries with degenerating records of internet freedoms. Though it remains to be seen how these jurisdictions’ governments will respond to block those routes off in the form of regulation and recrimination; with statutes and sanctions.

Through policy – and through punishment, too.



Read next: Study Shows ChatGPT's Rapid Adoption at 55%, 33% Raise AI Usage Despite Lingering Privacy Concerns
by Asim BN via Digital Information World

Study Shows ChatGPT's Rapid Adoption at 55%, 33% Raise AI Usage Despite Lingering Privacy Concerns

Tidio recently conducted a study on the first anniversary of generative AI being a mass product and the first year of ChatGPT. Have society’s expectations come true? Do people use AI more or less than before? Do we fear it as much as in the beginning? The answers provide a mixed bag of satisfaction and fears.

In November 2022, OpenAI unveiled ChatGPT, initially perceived as merely another playful bot. However, its impact swiftly reverberated across the tech industry and society at large, catalyzing a transformative shift. With over 100 million users embracing it within a year, ChatGPT emerged as a catalyst for change.

Users swiftly integrated ChatGPT into their daily routines, with a large portion trying it immediately upon release. Now, a staggering 88% of people are regular ChatGPT users, harnessing its capabilities across various domains. From aiding decision-making to solving work-related problems, so many people found a way the tool can help them.

The other findings also highlight the profound influence of ChatGPT. As revealed by our research, a significant 55% of users tried ChatGPT immediately upon its release, while 34% exercised patience before giving it a go. Moreover, our findings indicate that 33% of users have significantly increased their AI usage since ChatGPT's introduction. Still, about 33% have altered their AI usage during the last year due to privacy and ethical concerns.

It’s true that while many users found their expectations met, concerns linger regarding privacy, biased responses, and the limitations of AI capabilities. A striking 89% of users reported that ChatGPT fulfilled their expectations, with enhancements in daily convenience, work efficiency, problem-solving, and learning experiences. However, challenges persist, as indicated by the 38% of users who expressed privacy concerns and the 33% who encountered biased responses.

Despite these challenges, people remain hopeful. Our research highlights that users envision AI facilitating breakthroughs in healthcare (35%) and education (36%), while fears persist regarding job displacement (32%) and dangerous AI exploitation (31%).

The impact of ChatGPT extends far beyond individual users, impacting industries such as tech, healthcare, education, and customer service. From facilitating efficiency gains in customer service to aiding medical research and educational advancements, ChatGPT has reshaped industry landscapes.

Yet, legal and regulatory hurdles continue to pop up. Issues surrounding data privacy, copyright infringement, and AI-generated biases call governments and officials for careful navigation. Ethical considerations are paramount as ChatGPT's influence deepens, emphasizing the imperative for responsible AI deployment.

In sum, while ChatGPT and AI offer boundless potential, many people remain skeptical due to potential issues AI can cause. Still, there has never been a bigger game changer in our lives than AI. Accessible to everyone online, it has helped us solve millions of problems, and will do even more. So, as society navigates the evolving landscape of AI adoption, ethical considerations and responsible usage must remain at the forefront.

Take a look at the below infographics for more insights:











Read next: The Top US Colleges and States for Local Entrepreneurs and Business Founders
by Irfan Ahmad via Digital Information World

Tuesday, February 27, 2024

The Top US Colleges and States for Local Entrepreneurs and Business Founders

Location. Location. Location.

No, we're not talking about one of the fundamental laws of property investment. Instead, we're focusing on where the next generation of business founders are deciding to launch their companies.

And for that, we've brought you this latest piece of research from the team at Switch On Business. It put together several charts showing the US colleges and states with the most local business founders, based on data collected from LinkedIn.

Here's a summary of all the results.

New York colleges produce the most local business founders

New York is the place to be for graduates who want to start a business. The city dominates the list of the top US colleges with the most graduate founders, with 8 entries in the top 20.

The New York colleges churning out local graduate founders include Baruch College, Columbia University, and The New School.

Of the New York schools on the list, Hunter College scored highest, with over half (54%) of its graduate founders staying in the Big Apple.

Let's also give a special mention to New York's Fashion Institute of Technology. 40% of its graduate founders started their business in New York. The fashion school also has an illustrious lineup of super-famous graduates who became some of the biggest names in fashion, such as Michael Kors and Calvin Klein.

Some of the highest-scoring schools outside New York City include Georgia State University (46.32%) and The University of Houston (41.23%).

Utah Valley graduates stay loyal to their state

An impressive 80% of all graduate founders from Utah Valley University remain in Utah following graduation.

So what's so great about Utah?

Put simply, it's one of the best states in the USA to set up and do business. Taxes are low, regulation is favorable, and the state economy is absolutely booming.

And with its thriving startup and tech scene, why would any ambitious graduate even think about leaving Utah? It has everything they need to get a new venture off the ground, then grow fast.

Utah Valley takes the top spot on a state-by-state analysis, but the rest of the chart belongs to California. Thirteen of the top twenty colleges in this part of the study are located in The Golden State.

The college with the most graduate founders in each state

Texas State University helps support the local economy by producing a large amount of graduate founders. Over two-thirds of all graduate founders who went to the college are now running a business in Texas.

Chicago's DePaul University is the top school in the state of Illinois for graduate founders. Just under half (49%) decided to stay in Illinois following matriculation.

These graduates are following in a fine tradition. Founded in 1898, DePaul has a strong commitment to serving local communities and providing access to education for all students, including first-generation college students and those from underrepresented groups. The school's founder wanted to ensure that students from all backgrounds could receive a quality education that would enable them to improve their lives and contribute positively to local economies.

US states with the most graduate founders

California and Texas are winning the battle to hold onto their best, brightest, and most ambitious graduate talent.

61% of all graduate founders in California remained in the state, while Texas boasts a graduate founder retention rate of 53%. Impressive stuff.

The same can't be said for Vermont, New Hampshire, and Connecticut. These three states are among the lowest scores of all. Each scored under 10%, meaning 9 out of 10 college founders who studied in states are putting their education to good use elsewhere.

But at least they didn't do as poorly as Rhode Island; less than 6% of its college founders have any interest in doing business in the state after college.

That's some serious brain drain. But where does all that potential move to? One possible answer is New York.

New York is less than 2 hours drive from Rhode Island. The city offers graduate founders a larger and more diverse market to target, as well as superior access to capital, talent, and a dynamic cultural and innovation ecosystem.

Searching for opportunity in California

Where do all the graduate founders who don't stay in their state move to?

According to this final infographic from Switch On Business, the answer is California.

California is a giant magnet for graduate talent, sucking in more graduate founders from across the USA than any other major state included in the study.

It's the smart choice location for graduate founders looking for that first break. A recent study found that new businesses in California have the best survival rate - or at least for the first year. And this is a crucial advantage in a country where 20% of startups never make it past that first critical 12 months.






Read next: People Equal Profits: New Study Reveals Revenue Generated Per Employee in Big Tech Firms
by Asim BN via Digital Information World

Meta Ends Lawsuit Against Data Scraping Company

Meta, the company behind Facebook and Instagram, recently decided to end its legal battle with Bright Data, a company from Israel known for collecting data from websites. Meta had accused Bright Data of taking information from its platforms without permission. This case was part of Meta's ongoing effort to stop companies from scraping, which means collecting large amounts of data from websites automatically.

The court, however, did not side with Meta on a key part of the lawsuit. It said Meta didn't prove that Bright Data took private data that wasn't supposed to be public. Because of this, Meta chose to drop the lawsuit instead of continuing the fight.

What made this case interesting was that Meta and Bright Data had worked together before. Meta had used Bright Data's services to gather data from online stores to help with its advertising. But when Bright Data started taking data from Meta's sites, Meta sued them.

The court's decision focused on whether the data Bright Data took was public or private. Meta showed the court a huge amount of Instagram data Bright Data had sold, but the court wasn't convinced this data was private. Meta also tried to show that Bright Data had access to private information, but the court found these examples unconvincing.

The court also disagreed with Meta's view on how Bright Data collected the data. It said using automated tools to get around website restrictions wasn't the same as breaking into a protected account.

Meta tried to argue that Bright Data used special tools and its own social media accounts to take the data, but the court found no evidence to support this claim. After losing a key part of the case, Meta announced it was thinking about what to do next.

Then, on February 23, 2024, Meta asked the court to close the case. It gave up on its last claim and decided not to appeal the decision that was in favor of Bright Data.

This outcome is unusual for Meta, which usually wins such cases. It has successfully stopped other companies from scraping its sites in the past. But this time, Bright Data said it didn't settle with Meta and won't change how it operates. The company sees this as a big win for itself and others who collect public data from websites.

Bright Data's CEO, Or Lenchner, said this decision supports their right to access public information on the web. He believes the internet should be open for everyone and no single company should control it.

Meta has not commented on the decision to end the lawsuit. This case was one of many where Meta has tried to protect its data from being taken and used by others without permission.

Meta ends legal battle with Bright Data as court finds insufficient evidence of data privacy violation.

Image: DIW - AIgen

Read next: US Supreme Court Weighs Laws Regulating Social Media Giants' Content Moderation
by Mahrukh Shahid via Digital Information World

US Supreme Court Weighs Laws Regulating Social Media Giants' Content Moderation

The Supreme Court recently looked into laws from Florida and Texas that are trying to put rules on how social media companies manage their content. These laws want to stop companies from blocking or limiting users they find problematic. Most of the justices seem to think that these laws might not respect the social media companies' rights to free speech. This is because the companies should be able to choose what content they want on their platforms, similar to how free speech laws protect individuals from government control but not from private companies.

During the discussions, which lasted almost four hours, justices from different political backgrounds shared their worries about the big influence of social media platforms like YouTube and Facebook. They wondered if these laws should be completely dismissed. Trade groups NetChoice and CCIA argue that these laws go against the Constitution’s First Amendment, which protects free speech, by limiting the companies' ability to select their content.

Some justices think there might be parts of the laws that could be okay, especially for other types of platforms or services like messaging apps. This means the court might not reject the laws fully. The decisions from the court could lead to more legal battles to see if these laws should be allowed.

The laws were made after social media companies banned former President Donald Trump following the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021. The rules in these laws try to control how companies can moderate content and require them to explain why they removed certain content. For example, the Florida law stops companies from banning political figures and controls "shadow banning," where user content is hidden. The Texas law stops platforms from banning users based on their opinions.
The court also discussed how these laws could affect not just big social media companies but also other businesses like Uber and Etsy, which allow user-generated content. The justices were careful about saying the laws should not apply to services like direct messaging or email because these don't involve the same free speech issues.

These cases are part of several legal issues the Supreme Court is dealing with regarding social media. Another big question, not directly part of this case, is about the legal protection internet companies have for content posted by their users. This protection has been a big deal for a long time, but the Supreme Court has not made a decision on it yet.

Photo: Digital Information World - AIgen

Read next: Breaking Barriers In The World Of Tech: World’s Most Spoken Languages Revealed
by Mahrukh Shahid via Digital Information World