Saturday, July 13, 2024

New Report Shows that 80% of the Companies in China Have Adopted Generative AI in their Businesses

According to a North Carolina based software company, SAS, more than 80% of the firms in China have started using generative AI. It is a proof that China is the country with the most firms using generative AI as compared to other countries. If we compare other countries to China’s usage of generative AI, only 54% of the companies in the globe use AI, while 65% of companies use AI in the USA.

The report by SAS says that China is not only incorporating AI in the work, but is also taking measures to make AI safe for all systems and processes. China has the most genAI patents with 38,000 GenAI patents registered in the past few years, as compared to the USA which has only 6,300 patents right now.

The report also mentions that many of the companies are using generative AI in China, the companies which have fully implemented AI into their systems are from the USA. China’s companies are also short on AI chips because the USA has stopped the export of the latest AI chips to China. 70% of the Asia-Pacific businesses are all prepared for any AI regulations, while 59% in North America and 52% in Northern Europe are prepared for it.

Despite all this, many of the businesses in the world are just rushing into implementing AI systems but no one is taking any safety measures for it. This could result in poor quality and compliance in work. Health care and public sector professionals say that they are least prepared for implementation of generative AI and its regulatory requirements but 70% of the retail businesses say that they are all prepared for it.


Read next: New Poll Suggests Most US Voters Want Safe AI Rather Than Competition with China
by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World

Meta Removes Restrictions from Former President Donald Trump's Accounts

Tech giant Meta has just made a controversial decision to remove any restrictions placed on accounts belonging to former US President Donald Trump.

The tech giant just announced updates on this event, including a statement explaining how Trump’s Facebook and Instagram suspension was ending.

This would mark the Republican leader’s new status online as a presidential nominee for the upcoming election race in the US as reported by media outlet Axios.

Meta got rid of Donald Trump from every single one of its platforms after an attack on the American Capitol Hill that took place on January 6, 2021. This is all thanks to extreme and unusual instances, Facebook’s parent firm added.

After the shocking Capitol Building attack, many felt Trump was to blame for the loss of life and great collateral damage done on the property as he instigated more Republicans to come out and defend the nation against the Democrats who beat the opposition by a huge margin.

The same year in May, Meta’s Oversight Board made a ruling related to how Facebook didn’t put out the right penalty with a suspension related to Donald Trump’s account online, even though it felt Trump intensely violated the company’s community guidelines.

In a new video statement shown online, Trump tells his party members that he loves them and how much they mean to him. He even called those taking part in the attack ‘great patriots’ and this footage was published three hours after the incident arose.

Such statements made involving the Capitol Attack also had the board convinced that Trump was in violation of the guideline that it had in place related to showing support for violence on its apps.

Two years on, Meta restored accounts belonging to Donald Trump after a suspension that was time-related and featured harsher punishments for breaking its rules. It was highlighted to be more than the average policy breaker on Meta’s apps and many wondered why the former president was being penalized unfairly.

This led to Meta releasing a statement on this front regarding how everyone is equal in its eyes and that’s why Trump would be given the same treatment as all others.

With the latest party conventions coming into place, it makes sense why Meta is making the abrupt change. Next week is when nominations for the Republican convention will be released for the next American President. So to ensure fair freedom of political expression, Meta says it needs to have a leveled playing field where all the presidential candidates would be treated on the same basis.

We saw Twitter take action against Trump in the past as well, after the Capitol incident. This was concerning three tweets published for causing violence. It began with a 12-hour suspension in 2021 and was closely followed up by a serious complete ban as he violated their community standards.


Image: DIW-AIgen

Read next: $100B In Illicit Funds Were Distributed By Suspect Digital Wallets In The Crypto World
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

Friday, July 12, 2024

OpenAI Creates Internal Scale To Assess Progress Of Its AI Models

Tech giant OpenAI has just produced an internal scale that is designed to assess and monitor the progress of its large language models or AI with the help of human intelligence.

The company’s spokesperson spoke to the media outlet Bloomberg about how several of its AI models are widely used around the globe including ChatGPT. After launching in its most basic level 1, it’s near to level 2 which it can solve problems equivalent to the PhD mind. Level 3 will soon be launched and that’s where the AI model could take decisions on the user’s behalf. Meanwhile, level 4 will give rise to the newest innovations on this front and level 5 is the last step to get success where AI would be capable of doing all of the organization’s work.

In the past, we’ve seen OpenAI define AI as an automated system that goes above and beyond the capabilities of humans to produce tasks of great economic value.

The company’s unique structure is based upon the firm’s mission to get AGI. Right now, tech experts claim that it’s a little hard to comprehend what’s meant in OpenAI’s charter on this front.

But a new scale does exist through which the company could test its progress and that which is carried out by other arch-rivals in the industry and when they’re close to attaining AGI.

It’s not an easy road and experts predict we’re still quite far away from getting computing power that can safely be called out as hitting the AGI target. It would take many more billions, experts predict to get to that level, probably five years or more.

The new scale is currently being tested and isn’t close to release soon but the company says it was rolled out the day after the company collaborated with the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

The goal is to see how advanced AI systems such as GPT-4o could assist with the likes of scientific research.

Meanwhile, the program manager explained how the main goal right now is to test how great the current offerings of OpenAI are, which has been scrutinized ever since it chose to enable the dissolution of its own security team of experts.

This news came when the group’s own head left the organization alongside another key AI researcher who offered his resignation after mentioning through a post how safety in the company has now taken a backseat and that’s not something they’re willing to compromise upon.

For now, no other details were provided in terms of how models are assigned to such levels. However, leaders did prove a research project making use of the GPT-4 AI model during a new meeting where human-like reasoning was on display.

Such a scale is designed to assist in what progress means for the firm instead of others assuming or wrongly interpreting it. For instance, different experts are saying different things about OpenAI's greatness.

Some feel it has a lot of shortcomings while OpenAI’s own CEO explained that it was necessary to push back matters like ignorance and ensure these models are potentially more intelligent than the rest.


Read next: Choosing Between TikTok and Snapchat for Effective Brand Marketing Strategies
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

Thursday, July 11, 2024

New Poll Suggests Most US Voters Want Safe AI Rather Than Competition with China

A new poll by AI Policy Institute (AIPI) conducted in June revealed that many US voters do not want the USA to compete with China in terms of AI tools, they just want safe AI usage. China is already progressing in AI development as most of the GenAI patents are from China. China has already registered 38,000 GenAI patents in the past couple of years. Even though the USA is always in the news because of its patents and competitiveness with China, it is still far behind with only 6,300 patents.

Many CEOs and lobbyists of tech industries say that too many regulations on AI tools will give China more advantage. According to the AIPI Poll, 75% of the Republicans and 75% of the Democrats think that administering rules and regulations on AI tools that cannot be used by terrorists and foreign adversaries against the USA will make the US progress more in AI tools. 50% said that safety restrictions should be imposed on AI tools instead of slowing AI development. Only 25% said that the US should make powerful AI tools fastly so it can compete with China.

63% of the US voters said that it is risky to export AI tools to US adversaries and should be illegal while 14% disagree on this. There are no proper AI regulations in the USA. Former chairman of the US Federal Communications Commission, Tom Wheeler, says that they were not prepared for the change the last year brought. So, now all policy makers are thinking hard about how to convert an industrial economy to a digital economy and then to an AI economy with keeping everyone’s interest and doubts in mind.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: The Innovation Game: Who's Winning the Patent Race in America?
by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World

X Moves Closer to Payments Vision After Securing Another US Money Transmitter License

Leading social media app X is pushing one step closer to its vision of attaining X Payments after the recent acceptance of another money transmitter license in the US.

The company just secured another application in the District of Columbia, adding to its long list of acceptances for X Payments in the country. To ensure its financial vision comes to life, the company needs to attain approvals from all states before moving on to the likes of money transfers and payments done in-stream.

This is one of Elon Musk’s biggest and broadest visions to date where it hopes to convert the app into a massive superpower online.

Musk does hope to make use of such experiences arising from the early days of the platform to see what it is that individuals could do with finances online. The overall consensus in this regard has to do with web payments getting accepted as a whole, along with some of the best financial tools to assist users in carrying out financial transactions through the app, similar to how a bank would operate.

Musk’s vision is huge and he does hope to give users the chance to enter a new modern gateway where X can provide loans amongst other services. So now, you can turn to X for all of your banking needs. And in case you’re wondering what benefits this could bring to X, well, it would soon become a part of users’ everyday existence, giving it all the hype it needs to be accepted as more than a social media platform.

As one can imagine, the plans are mighty ambitious and need so much to get right. Elon Musk hopes that this app will cater to all such demands and then slowly but surely turn into a massive utility for all.

Still, it’s a lot of work needed to make Musk’s plan come to life and as per new reports, Musk hoped to provide payments to X users all around the globe. But since then, he’s been forced to scale this ambition to American-only payments, thanks to new initial pushback from the American authorities.

Today, X has more than 31 licenses across different states in the nation. This is only stage one of assisting the vision to come into existence as the journey to getting full acceptance is long.

The next step would be getting payment processor approval from every single American state for online shopping carried out through the X app. So as you can imagine, if the US process is so stringent, the challenges that would come in other countries around the globe are even more intense as the app would be further scrutinized before it can attain approval.

So as you can see, it’s a long road home but Elon Musk is sticking to his plans with no signs of aborting the project anytime soon. The only question that some experts are having is whether or not Musk could get enough users to make payments through this platform.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next:

• Researchers Explore How YouTube Connections Satisfy Emotional Needs, Contrasting With In-person Relationships

• AV-Test Rates Top Android Security Apps: Avast, AVG, Bitdefender Lead

Spotting A.I. Generative Material With Its Inherent Flaws
by Dr. Hura Anwar via Digital Information World

Wednesday, July 10, 2024

Spotting A.I. Generative Material With Its Inherent Flaws

Generative A.I. has been a blessing for making tasks easier, the process of work faster and consequently making room for leisure, but in parallel, artificial intelligence also has become the biggest source of cheating and a way out for people not interested in doing research and pretending to be hard workers. This ongoing advancements in A.I. has given headaches to professionals, companies and academies round the world, unable to distinguish man-written original works and A.I. generative.

Fortunately, like all technologies, A.I. operates with hidden flaws which takes off the mask of originality from so-called-original work. A.I. has a tendency of using same words frequently in a specific context without any apparent need of using those words successively. By comparing the frequency of these words in publications of the pre-A.I.-language-model era, A.I. generative works are easily marked out. Similarly, A.I. generative videos exhibit so many peculiarities not found in man-made videos.

Frequent Words in A.I. Generative Texts

The researchers from University of Tubingen and Northwestern University analyzed 14 million research papers published between 2010 and 2014 to find out the frequency of all words over the years.

1) Delving In

The researchers realized that the word ‘delve’ has been used 25 times more than it was used in the pre-A.I. era. The same goes for the words ‘showcasing’ and ‘underscores’ whose usage surged nine times in the previous three years. Similarly, the usage of words like ‘potential’, ‘finding’, and ‘crucial’ increased by 4.1%, 2.7% and 2.6% respectively.

2) An Intricate Play

The phrase, an intricate play, as well as the words ‘comprehensive’ and ‘pivotal’, also saw a surge in their usage in the past two years, clearly pointing towards the help taken from A.I. language models.

Some might claim this to be coincidental, having nothing to do with A.I., for languages go through evolutionary process, making some words obsolete and others more demanding. But the history of language usage vividly depicts that a sudden surge in the usage of words has mostly been related to a major event, specifically an epidemic or pandemic, like coronavirus. A similar surge was observed after the outbreak of ‘zika’ and ‘ebola’ viruses, making the words, zika, ebola, pandemic, epidemic and lockdown, more common.
The sudden surge in specific words and phrases in the post-A.I. era, is contrary to the trend observed during the pandemics. Unlike during the pandemics, there is no relation between the words or phrases and their sudden surge in usage. The only reasonable argument is that those works containing the words successively are the products of A.I. that frequently used the words as per its modeling.

Clues for Specialists

After using A.I. language models, like ChatGPT, an English specialist realizes that A.I. models always utilize the same patterns, moods and words mostly. For example, the imperative mood is their favorite while answering questions, and they utilize it successively. Similarly, a highly formal language permeates an A.I.-written text, with hardly any informal or less formal word, like ‘pal’, used. Moreover, figurative language or idioms are rarely employed by A.I. models for the obvious reason that figurative language involves a degree of emotions of human beings, and that its usage requires deep linguistic and contextual comprehension lacked by A.I.

The measure to detect A.I. in works has now become a necessity due to A.I.'s frequent conjuring up inauthentic references, making false claims regarding different matters and providing inadequate summaries.
As A.I. becomes more advanced year after year, it will most likely get over this panacea as well. Moreover, with research on the flaws of A.I. gets more intense, it will also be providing A.I. users how to filter out flaws from A.I. generative works and remain undetected.

A.I. Generative Videos

A.I. generative videos are more flawed than A.I. texts because they are visual, making them easily detectable by naked eyes.

1) Gibberish Text

Artificial intelligence, even being a language model, does not have the capacity to comprehend a language as humans do. For this reason, you will find either there is no text in A.I. generative videos/images or there are absolutely indelible words written on different buildings or objects appearing in A.I. videos.

2) Slow and Fast Movement of Frames

A.I. generative videos frames move either too fast to hide flaws, or too slow for the same purpose. All flaws come to the front on pausing these videos at small intervals.

3) Weirdness

The most detectable flaw is the weirdness that one encounters in A.I. videos. No laws of science work in A.I. generative world. Sometimes the construction of buildings is weird as well as their alignment; some videos show people with no faces; in some people magically disappear; and some videos show humans mingling their bodies into one another, along with super weird hands.

4) Unnaturalness

A.I cannot depict natural human emotions as we naturally show. If you want a strange smile and a strange fluttering of hair, A.I. generative world is the perfect place for you. People depicted in A.I. videos try to imitate human emotions and gestures, but fail horribly.

5) Too Perfect or Too Imperfect

There are two possibilities in A.I. generative videos and images: either they depict imperfectness of human emotions, gestures and body parts, or perfectness of designs of cities and automobiles, too perfect to exist in the real world.

6) Context

Context matters and is the key to find out the authenticity of videos. Does the video in question have any other versions? What is the source of it, a news channel or a verified X account? Is any authentic source using the video as a reference?

When fulfilling a prompt given by us, A.I. does not really care about how human beings look or behave, rather it just creates its conception of humans or their behavior by mingling pixels together, resulting in a mess.

The flaws make A.I. generative content and videos detectable. No doubt, in the coming years, the rapid progress in the realm of A.I. might reduce these flaws to smithereens. But a clue will always be there for a diligent eye.

Image: DIW-Aigen

Read next: 

• AI Could Promote Rise In Distrust Of Digital Information, Google Study Warns

• The Future Of AI In Business: Microsoft Debunks Misconceptions Linked To This Groundbreaking Tech

• AI Bubble Close To Hitting Tipping Point As New Report Says Companies Need $600 Billion Each Year To Pay For Infrastructure
by Ehtasham Ahmad via Digital Information World

AV-Test Rates Top Android Security Apps: Avast, AVG, Bitdefender Lead

AV-Test evaluated 14 mobile security products for Android to find out which ones work the best. The security apps or products were used in their default settings with their latest versions. The research mostly focused on usability and malware detection of these security products on Android phones. Their performances and false positives were also evaluated.

The security products were evaluated through a scale of 1 to 6. Being awarded 6 meant outstanding, 3 was satisfactory and 0 was insufficient. Avast was awarded 6 points on protection, performance and usability. Same was the case with AVG, Bitdefender, ESET, F-secure, Google, Kaspersky, McAfee and Norton.

Avira and TotalAV were awarded 6 points on protection and performance but both got 5 points for usability. Protectstar got 5.5 points for protection, 6 for performance and 3 for usability. ShieldApps had 6 points for both performance and usability but got 5.5 points for protection. SOPHOS got 6 points for protection and performance. Its usability was given 5 points. Take a look at the chart below for more insights:


Read next: 


by Arooj Ahmed via Digital Information World